VEM vs. EDIV
VEM (Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) and EDIV (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. VEM is actively managed, while EDIV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
VEM vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VEM
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDIV
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 13.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
VEM vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VEM Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 8.93% |
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEM and EDIV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEM vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank
VEM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EDIV
VEM vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (VEM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEM | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEM vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEM drawdown since its inception was -13.55%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEM and EDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEM | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -53.36% | +39.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.85% | -2.25% | -3.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -19.26% | +15.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility
VEM vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEM | EDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.97% | 12.74% | +18.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.97% | 13.95% | +17.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.97% | 17.31% | +13.66% |
VEM vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VEM and EDIV have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
VEM vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison
VEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than EDIV's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDIV SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 4.19% | 4.69% | 3.94% | 4.26% | 4.94% | 3.84% | 3.52% | 3.83% | 3.41% | 2.99% | 4.94% | 5.33% |
VEM Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEM and EDIV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VEM and EDIV have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 2.02% for VEM.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus and State Street.
Find the right allocation for VEM and EDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer