PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEGN vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEGN vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEGN achieves a 32.90% return, which is significantly higher than FMTM's 31.09% return.


VEGN

1D
1.08%
1M
19.56%
YTD
32.90%
6M
34.35%
1Y
52.58%
3Y*
30.29%
5Y*
17.14%
10Y*

FMTM

1D
2.89%
1M
5.88%
YTD
31.09%
6M
32.17%
1Y
63.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEGN vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VEGN
US Vegan Climate ETF
32.90%21.33%
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
31.09%27.90%

Correlation

The correlation between VEGN and FMTM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025

0.72

The correlation between VEGN and FMTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEGN vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEGN
VEGN Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VEGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGN Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEGN vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEGNFMTMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.25

2.78

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.22

3.41

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.46

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

5.24

-0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.23

20.53

-2.30

VEGN vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEGN Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is comparable to the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEGN and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEGNFMTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

2.78

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

2.36

-1.49

Drawdowns

VEGN vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEGN drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEGN and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEGNFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.14%

-12.12%

-22.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.85%

-12.12%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-1.89%

-5.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.10%

-0.20%

Volatility

VEGN vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) is 5.95%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that VEGN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEGNFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

6.52%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.38%

17.88%

-4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

22.82%

-6.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.27%

22.98%

-2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.77%

22.98%

-0.21%

VEGN vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEGN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEGN vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

VEGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than FMTM's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FMTM
MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF
0.23%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEGN
US Vegan Climate ETF
0.44%0.51%0.51%0.67%0.81%0.41%0.71%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEGN and FMTM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMTM has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to VEGN (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEGN dropped -34.14% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 63.21% vs 52.58% for VEGN. On fees, FMTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, VEGN has been the lower-risk option at 5.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 63.21% return vs 52.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for VEGN.

VEGN has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.23% for FMTM.

VEGN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for VEGN and 0.45% for FMTM.

VEGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEGN and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer