VEGN vs. FAAR
VEGN (US Vegan Climate ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEGN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the US Vegan Climate Index, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. VEGN is passively managed, while FAAR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VEGN returned 15.68%/yr vs 7.72%/yr for FAAR. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VEGN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
VEGN vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEGN achieves a 29.79% return, which is significantly higher than FAAR's 19.14% return.
VEGN
- 1D
- -3.40%
- 1M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 29.79%
- 6M
- 29.01%
- 1Y
- 46.88%
- 3Y*
- 28.58%
- 5Y*
- 15.68%
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- 19.14%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 28.33%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
VEGN vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF | 29.79% | 13.71% | 25.42% | 38.10% | -26.87% | 26.01% | 27.72% | 9.45% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 19.14% | 8.07% | 5.97% | -5.63% | 10.15% | 12.34% | 8.60% | -2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEGN and FAAR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2019 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEGN vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
VEGN
FAAR
VEGN vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEGN | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.37 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 4.52 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.55 | 15.18 | +0.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEGN vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEGN drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEGN and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEGN | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.14% | -18.03% | -16.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.85% | -6.29% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.91% | -11.54% | -9.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.40% | -18.03% | -15.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -6.29% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -7.82% | +0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 1.87% | +1.15% |
Volatility
VEGN vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) has a higher volatility of 9.97% compared to First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) at 2.55%. This indicates that VEGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEGN | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.97% | 2.55% | +7.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.75% | 9.68% | +6.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 13.38% | +4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 12.96% | +7.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 11.54% | +11.39% |
VEGN vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEGN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEGN vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
VEGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than FAAR's 9.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.66% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.67% | 0.81% | 0.41% | 0.71% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEGN and FAAR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEGN has higher volatility (9.97%) compared to FAAR (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEGN dropped -34.14% vs FAAR's -18.03%.
On 5-year performance, VEGN leads with 15.68% vs 7.72% for FAAR. On fees, VEGN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FAAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VEGN has performed better with a 15.68% return vs 7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEGN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.66%, compared with 0.50% for VEGN.
VEGN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Beyond Investing and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for VEGN and 0.95% for FAAR.
VEGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEGN and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer