VEGN vs. ARWG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

VEGN (US Vegan Climate ETF) and ARWG (Archer Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. VEGN is passively managed, while ARWG is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VEGN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ARWG.

Performance

VEGN vs. ARWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) and Archer Growth ETF (ARWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEGN achieves a 29.79% return, which is significantly higher than ARWG's 5.19% return.

VEGN

• 1D: -3.40%
• 1M: 6.70%
• YTD: 29.79%
• 6M: 29.01%
• 1Y: 46.88%
• 3Y*: 28.58%
• 5Y*: 15.68%
• 10Y*: —

ARWG

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: 3.98%
• YTD: 5.19%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEGN vs. ARWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF	29.79%	-1.06%
ARWG Archer Growth ETF	5.19%	-0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between VEGN and ARWG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

VEGN vs. ARWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEGN

VEGN Risk / Return Rank: 81
VEGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
VEGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
VEGN Omega Ratio Rank: 80
VEGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
VEGN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

ARWG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEGN vs. ARWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) and Archer Growth ETF (ARWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VEGN	ARWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.98	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.55	—	—

Drawdowns

VEGN vs. ARWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEGN drawdown since its inception was -34.14%, which is greater than ARWG's maximum drawdown of -12.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEGN and ARWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	VEGN	ARWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.14%	-12.79%	-21.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.40%	-2.73%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-3.35%	-4.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VEGN	ARWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.33%	23.04%	-4.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.63%	23.04%	-2.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.93%	23.04%	-0.11%

VEGN vs. ARWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEGN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ARWG's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

VEGN vs. ARWG - Dividend Comparison

VEGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, more than ARWG's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ARWG Archer Growth ETF	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VEGN US Vegan Climate ETF	0.50%	0.51%	0.51%	0.67%	0.81%	0.41%	0.71%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VEGN and ARWG in my portfolio?

VEGN and ARWG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VEGN or ARWG?

On fees, VEGN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VEGN or ARWG?

VEGN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ARWG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VEGN or ARWG?

VEGN has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.13% for ARWG.

What is the main difference between VEGN and ARWG?

They also come from different issuers: Beyond Investing and Archer Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for VEGN and 0.85% for ARWG.