PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEGA vs. HERD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEGA vs. HERD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEGA achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than HERD's 16.91% return.


VEGA

1D
1.23%
1M
1.59%
6M
5.92%
YTD
8.26%
1Y
15.47%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
7.65%
ALL TIME*
6.24%

HERD

1D
1.01%
1M
5.99%
6M
11.85%
YTD
16.91%
1Y
29.79%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$174.50K$189.12K$184.31K
$257.33K$224.28K$298.61K

VEGA vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
8.26%15.83%11.20%15.12%-15.02%12.36%8.37%6.41%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
16.91%19.07%2.91%20.72%-6.96%28.58%10.71%6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between VEGA and HERD is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.58

The correlation between VEGA and HERD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEGA vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VEGA
VEGA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGA Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VEGA vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEGAHERDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.47

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

5.27

-3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.44

16.36

-6.92

VEGA vs. HERD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEGA Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the HERD Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEGA and HERD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEGA vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEGA drawdown since its inception was -28.37%, smaller than the maximum HERD drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEGA and HERD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEGAHERDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.37%

-39.41%

+11.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-5.68%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

-18.90%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.78%

-21.60%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.76%

-4.50%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.83%

-0.19%

Volatility

VEGA vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF (VEGA) is 3.18%, while Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that VEGA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HERD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEGAHERDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.43%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

8.76%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.94%

11.76%

-1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.31%

17.69%

-5.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.74%

20.36%

-7.62%

VEGA vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEGA has a 2.02% expense ratio, which is higher than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEGA vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison

VEGA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than HERD's 2.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
2.68%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEGA
AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF
1.24%1.34%1.05%1.12%1.89%0.55%0.28%0.44%0.45%0.00%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEGA and HERD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HERD has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to VEGA (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEGA dropped -28.37% vs HERD's -39.41%.

On 5-year performance, HERD leads with 10.88% vs 7.00% for VEGA. On fees, HERD is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, VEGA has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HERD has performed better with a 10.88% return vs 7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HERD is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 2.02% for VEGA.

HERD has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 1.24% for VEGA.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 2.02% for VEGA and 0.73% for HERD.

HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEGA and HERD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer