PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEEV vs. TPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VEEV vs. TPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEEV achieves a -28.53% return, which is significantly lower than TPL's 32.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VEEV has underperformed TPL with an annualized return of 16.73%, while TPL has yielded a comparatively higher 36.58% annualized return.


VEEV

1D
-1.24%
1M
0.43%
YTD
-28.53%
6M
-28.54%
1Y
-43.54%
3Y*
-5.80%
5Y*
-11.82%
10Y*
16.73%

TPL

1D
2.53%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
32.28%
6M
35.91%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
38.06%
5Y*
18.80%
10Y*
36.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEEV vs. TPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEEV
Veeva Systems Inc.
-28.53%6.17%9.21%19.30%-36.83%-6.16%93.55%57.48%61.58%35.82%
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
32.28%-21.61%115.31%-32.40%91.29%73.25%-4.69%44.58%21.96%51.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VEEV and TPL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2013

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VEEV:

$26.48B

TPL:

$26.15B

EPS

VEEV:

$5.63

TPL:

$7.30

PE Ratio

VEEV:

28.36

TPL:

51.93

PEG Ratio

VEEV:

1.47

TPL:

2.75

PS Ratio

VEEV:

8.04

TPL:

31.17

PB Ratio

VEEV:

3.63

TPL:

16.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

VEEV:

$3.32B

TPL:

$839.03M

Gross Profit (TTM)

VEEV:

$2.49B

TPL:

$625.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

VEEV:

$1.00B

TPL:

$690.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEEV vs. TPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEEV
VEEV Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
VEEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEEV Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
VEEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEEV Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

TPL
TPL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEEV vs. TPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEEVTPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.06

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

0.13

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.51

0.25

-1.76

VEEV vs. TPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEEV Sharpe Ratio is -1.22, which is lower than the TPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEEV and TPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEEV vs. TPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEEV drawdown since its inception was -61.35%, smaller than the maximum TPL drawdown of -73.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEEV and TPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEEVTPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.35%

-73.05%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.55%

-31.68%

-18.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.55%

-52.22%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.69%

-52.50%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.69%

-65.46%

+9.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.21%

-33.65%

-19.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.08%

-27.27%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.76%

17.08%

+11.68%

Volatility

VEEV vs. TPL - Volatility Comparison

Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) have volatilities of 14.08% and 14.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEEVTPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.08%

14.23%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.27%

38.06%

-8.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.87%

46.87%

-11.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.98%

46.25%

-8.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.23%

47.10%

-8.87%

Dividends

VEEV vs. TPL - Dividend Comparison

VEEV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
0.60%0.74%1.37%0.83%1.37%0.88%2.20%0.22%0.55%0.30%0.10%0.22%
VEEV
Veeva Systems Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VEEV vs. TPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Veeva Systems Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
882.95M
236.82M
(VEEV) Total Revenue
(TPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VEEV vs. TPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Veeva Systems Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
74.7%
0
Portfolio components
VEEV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Veeva Systems Inc. reported a gross profit of 659.69M and revenue of 882.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.7%.

TPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 236.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

VEEV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Veeva Systems Inc. reported an operating income of 273.11M and revenue of 882.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.9%.

TPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported an operating income of 182.33M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 77.0%.

VEEV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Veeva Systems Inc. reported a net income of 260.94M and revenue of 882.95M, resulting in a net margin of 29.6%.

TPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a net income of 142.90M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in a net margin of 60.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VEEV and TPL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPL has higher volatility (14.23%) compared to VEEV (14.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEEV dropped -61.35% vs TPL's -73.05%.

TPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEEV and TPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer