VEA vs. SCHO
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and SCHO (Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while SCHO is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VEA returned 10.72%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for SCHO. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
VEA vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly higher than SCHO's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has outperformed SCHO with an annualized return of 10.72%, while SCHO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.71% annualized return.
VEA
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 14.73%
- 6M
- 16.65%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
SCHO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.82%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
VEA vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.73% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 0.54% | 5.49% | 3.65% | 4.31% | -3.87% | -0.64% | 3.11% | 3.47% | 1.37% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and SCHO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | -0.06 |
The correlation between VEA and SCHO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VEA vs. SCHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
SCHO
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
VEA
SCHO
Industrials
VEA
SCHO
-
Technology
VEA
SCHO
Healthcare
VEA
SCHO
-
Basic Materials
VEA
SCHO
-
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
SCHO
-
Consumer Defensive
VEA
SCHO
-
Energy
VEA
SCHO
-
Communication Services
VEA
SCHO
Utilities
VEA
SCHO
-
Real Estate
VEA
SCHO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
SCHO
VEA vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VEA | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.50 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 3.91 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 16.48 | -6.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VEA vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and SCHO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -5.69% | -54.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -0.86% | -10.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -0.98% | -12.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -5.69% | -24.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | -5.69% | -30.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.14% | -0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.28% | -0.61% | -12.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 0.20% | +2.82% |
Volatility
VEA vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.43%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | SCHO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 0.43% | +6.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.38% | 0.93% | +13.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.58% | 1.37% | +15.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 1.98% | +14.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 1.56% | +15.84% |
VEA vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VEA and SCHO have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VEA vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than SCHO's 3.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 3.90% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.27% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VEA and SCHO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to SCHO (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs SCHO's -5.69%.
On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.72% vs 1.71% for SCHO. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA and SCHO have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
SCHO has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHO is Government Bonds. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab.
SCHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and SCHO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer