PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. NVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. NVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -16.56% return. Over the past 10 years, VEA has outperformed NVO with an annualized return of 10.14%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.20% annualized return.


VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%

NVO

1D
-4.52%
1M
-10.96%
YTD
-16.56%
6M
-9.23%
1Y
-42.47%
3Y*
-17.53%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
6.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
-16.56%-39.22%-15.93%54.84%22.66%63.52%23.33%28.70%-12.98%52.92%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and NVO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

NVO
NVO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
NVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
NVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEANVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.86

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

-0.77

+3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

-1.14

+10.53

VEA vs. NVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the NVO Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and NVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEANVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

-0.82

+2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.05

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.19

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.47

-0.23

Drawdowns

VEA vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum NVO drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and NVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEANVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-74.70%

+14.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-55.03%

+43.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-74.70%

+61.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-74.70%

+44.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

-74.70%

+38.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-70.19%

+66.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-17.77%

+4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

37.21%

-34.21%

Volatility

VEA vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 6.03%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a volatility of 9.75%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEANVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

9.75%

-3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

38.30%

-24.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

52.08%

-35.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

38.31%

-21.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

32.56%

-15.16%

Dividends

VEA vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than NVO's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
4.39%3.31%1.68%1.00%1.20%1.35%1.87%2.14%1.45%1.52%2.87%0.92%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and NVO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVO has higher volatility (9.75%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs NVO's -74.70%.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and NVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer