PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than GDE's -1.30% return.


VEA

1D
-0.67%
1M
-4.26%
6M
7.02%
YTD
11.59%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
17.14%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
9.92%
ALL TIME*
5.03%

GDE

1D
-0.20%
1M
-4.95%
6M
-7.43%
YTD
-1.30%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
39.14%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
11.59%35.16%3.15%17.93%-8.79%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
-1.30%73.76%44.79%33.85%-8.58%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and GDE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022

0.68

The correlation between VEA and GDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEAGDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

1.44

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

3.38

+4.97

VEA vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEAGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-32.01%

-28.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-22.66%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-22.66%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-20.14%

+15.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.22%

-8.16%

-5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

9.62%

-6.53%

Volatility

VEA vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 5.31%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEAGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

7.43%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.14%

26.34%

-11.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.09%

30.85%

-13.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.78%

27.10%

-10.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

27.10%

-9.92%

VEA vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than GDE's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
4.38%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and GDE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDE has higher volatility (7.43%) compared to VEA (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs GDE's -32.01%.

On 3-year performance, GDE leads with 39.14% vs 17.14% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDE has performed better with a 39.14% return vs 17.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GDE.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GDE is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.20% for GDE.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer