PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. DFUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. DFUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly lower than DFUV's 16.05% return.


VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%

DFUV

1D
0.64%
1M
2.84%
YTD
16.05%
6M
17.87%
1Y
32.93%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. DFUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-1.68%
DFUV
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
16.05%15.77%11.79%13.25%-0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and DFUV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022

0.75

The correlation between VEA and DFUV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEA vs. DFUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEA
DFUV

Financial Services

23.3%
21.9%

Industrials

19.2%
13.6%

Technology

13.8%
15.7%

Healthcare

8.2%
13.7%

Basic Materials

7.5%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
3.4%

Energy

5.4%
12.9%

Communication Services

3.4%
5.1%

Utilities

3.3%
0.1%

Real Estate

2.7%
0.4%

Financial Services

VEA
23.3%
DFUV
21.9%

Industrials

VEA
19.2%
DFUV
13.6%

Technology

VEA
13.8%
DFUV
15.7%

Healthcare

VEA
8.2%
DFUV
13.7%

Basic Materials

VEA
7.5%
DFUV
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VEA
7.5%
DFUV
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

VEA
5.6%
DFUV
3.4%

Energy

VEA
5.4%
DFUV
12.9%

Communication Services

VEA
3.4%
DFUV
5.1%

Utilities

VEA
3.3%
DFUV
0.1%

Real Estate

VEA
2.7%
DFUV
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. DFUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

DFUV
DFUV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DFUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. DFUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEADFUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.49

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

5.51

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

19.90

-10.52

VEA vs. DFUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the DFUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and DFUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEADFUVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.78

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.88

-0.64

Drawdowns

VEA vs. DFUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than DFUV's maximum drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and DFUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEADFUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-17.60%

-43.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-6.01%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-17.60%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.40%

-1.36%

-2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-3.64%

-9.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

1.66%

+1.34%

Volatility

VEA vs. DFUV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) at 3.39%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEADFUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

3.39%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

8.69%

+5.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

11.93%

+4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

16.25%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

16.25%

+1.15%

VEA vs. DFUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DFUV's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEA vs. DFUV - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than DFUV's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFUV
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
1.36%1.55%1.64%1.72%1.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and DFUV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to DFUV (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs DFUV's -17.60%.

On 3-year performance, DFUV leads with 18.68% vs 18.65% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFUV has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFUV has performed better with a 18.68% return vs 18.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DFUV.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.36% for DFUV.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DFUV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.21% for DFUV.

DFUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and DFUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer