VEA vs. DFIS
VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) and DFIS (Dimensional International Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while DFIS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. VEA is passively managed, while DFIS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VEA returned 18.65%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for DFIS. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VEA charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for DFIS.
Performance
VEA vs. DFIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly higher than DFIS's 8.42% return.
VEA
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
DFIS
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 25.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEA vs. DFIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 12.02% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -10.29% |
DFIS Dimensional International Small Cap ETF | 8.42% | 37.49% | 3.80% | 15.19% | -12.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between VEA and DFIS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VEA and DFIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
VEA vs. DFIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VEA
DFIS
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
VEA
DFIS
Industrials
VEA
DFIS
Technology
VEA
DFIS
Healthcare
VEA
DFIS
Basic Materials
VEA
DFIS
Consumer Cyclical
VEA
DFIS
Consumer Defensive
VEA
DFIS
Energy
VEA
DFIS
Communication Services
VEA
DFIS
Utilities
VEA
DFIS
Real Estate
VEA
DFIS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VEA vs. DFIS — Risk / Return Rank
VEA
DFIS
VEA vs. DFIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VEA | DFIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.31 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.03 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 7.79 | +1.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VEA | DFIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 1.71 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.64 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
VEA vs. DFIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, which is greater than DFIS's maximum drawdown of -27.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and DFIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VEA | DFIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.68% | -27.23% | -33.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -12.44% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.45% | -13.55% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -3.55% | +0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.29% | -6.16% | -7.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 3.23% | -0.23% |
Volatility
VEA vs. DFIS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) at 4.81%. This indicates that VEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VEA | DFIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 4.81% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.91% | 12.36% | +1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.15% | 14.80% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 17.35% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.40% | 17.35% | +0.05% |
VEA vs. DFIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIS's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VEA vs. DFIS - Dividend Comparison
VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than DFIS's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIS Dimensional International Small Cap ETF | 2.05% | 2.23% | 2.19% | 2.36% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.69% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VEA and DFIS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to DFIS (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs DFIS's -27.23%.
On 3-year performance, VEA leads with 18.65% vs 18.49% for DFIS. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFIS has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VEA has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 18.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DFIS.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.05% for DFIS.
VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DFIS is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.39% for DFIS.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VEA and DFIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer