PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEA vs. BITW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEA vs. BITW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEA achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly higher than BITW's -35.16% return.


VEA

1D
0.16%
1M
0.27%
YTD
13.29%
6M
12.91%
1Y
28.78%
3Y*
19.54%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
10.74%

BITW

1D
-4.15%
1M
-21.33%
YTD
-35.16%
6M
-35.19%
1Y
-40.47%
3Y*
49.95%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEA vs. BITW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.29%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%13.70%
BITW
Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF
-35.16%-2.63%160.69%331.10%-85.92%-36.83%403.25%

Correlation

The correlation between VEA and BITW is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2020

0.33

The correlation between VEA and BITW shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEA vs. BITW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BITW
BITW Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BITW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITW Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITW Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BITW Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITW Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEA vs. BITW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEABITWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.88

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

-0.73

+3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

-1.24

+10.79

VEA vs. BITW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the BITW Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEA and BITW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEA vs. BITW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEA drawdown since its inception was -60.68%, smaller than the maximum BITW drawdown of -96.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEA and BITW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEABITWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.68%

-96.46%

+35.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-55.84%

+44.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.45%

-55.84%

+42.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-91.93%

+62.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.91%

-72.59%

+69.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-69.56%

+56.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

32.75%

-29.73%

Volatility

VEA vs. BITW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) is 7.08%, while Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) has a volatility of 14.37%. This indicates that VEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEABITWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.08%

14.37%

-7.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

37.20%

-22.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.78%

50.03%

-33.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

65.58%

-48.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

108.32%

-91.12%

VEA vs. BITW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEA has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BITW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEA vs. BITW - Dividend Comparison

VEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while BITW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BITW
Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.58%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEA and BITW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITW has higher volatility (14.37%) compared to VEA (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEA dropped -60.68% vs BITW's -96.46%.

On 5-year performance, VEA leads with 9.47% vs 1.71% for BITW. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 7.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEA has performed better with a 9.47% return vs 1.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BITW.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.00% for BITW.

VEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BITW is Cryptocurrency. VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index, while BITW tracks Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VEA and 0.75% for BITW.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEA and BITW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer