VDPG.L vs. VMIG.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) and VMIG.L (Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - VDPG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while VMIG.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VDPG.L returned 12.82%/yr vs 6.27%/yr for VMIG.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VDPG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VMIG.L.

Performance

VDPG.L vs. VMIG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDPG.L achieves a 47.65% return, which is significantly higher than VMIG.L's 5.33% return.

VDPG.L

• 1D: 4.17%
• 1M: 4.65%
• YTD: 47.65%
• 6M: 52.89%
• 1Y: 79.33%
• 3Y*: 24.13%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: —

VMIG.L

• 1D: 1.60%
• 1M: 3.93%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 6M: 8.43%
• 1Y: 12.81%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: 6.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDPG.L vs. VMIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc	47.65%	30.58%	-3.06%	4.10%	-1.89%	1.95%	15.56%	-19.58%
VMIG.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating	5.33%	13.52%	11.01%	11.96%	-14.58%	19.28%	-2.22%	11.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VDPG.L and VMIG.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019	0.58

The correlation between VDPG.L and VMIG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VDPG.L vs. VMIG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VDPG.L	VMIG.L
Technology	30.2%	9.4%
Financial Services	25.3%	19.4%
Industrials	12.5%	19.9%
Basic Materials	9.5%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	13.3%
Real Estate	4.9%	9.4%
Healthcare	3.3%	4.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	6.1%
Communication Services	2.4%	5.9%
Energy	2.3%	2.5%
Utilities	2.0%	3.0%

Return for Risk

VDPG.L vs. VMIG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDPG.L

VDPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
VDPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VDPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VDPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
VDPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 92

VMIG.L

VMIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 31
VMIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
VMIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
VMIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 31
VMIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
VMIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDPG.L vs. VMIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VDPG.L	VMIG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.62	1.03	+2.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.28	1.56	+2.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.19	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.87	1.10	+4.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.42	3.96	+16.46

VDPG.L vs. VMIG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the VMIG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDPG.L and VMIG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VDPG.L vs. VMIG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.69%, roughly equal to the maximum VMIG.L drawdown of -41.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPG.L and VMIG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VDPG.L	VMIG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.69%	-41.38%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.45%	-11.59%	-1.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.18%	-14.60%	-11.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.18%	-27.02%	+0.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.74%	-0.54%	-4.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.24%	-7.76%	-3.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.87%	3.23%	+0.64%

Volatility

VDPG.L vs. VMIG.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.04% compared to Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating (VMIG.L) at 3.69%. This indicates that VDPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VDPG.L	VMIG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.04%	3.69%	+7.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.69%	10.30%	+9.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.82%	12.44%	+9.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.25%	15.07%	+6.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.27%	17.37%	+5.90%

VDPG.L vs. VMIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDPG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VMIG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VDPG.L vs. VMIG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VDPG.L nor VMIG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VMIG.L Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF (GBP) Accumulating	0.00%	0.51%	3.22%	3.33%	3.21%	2.55%	2.05%	1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VDPG.L and VMIG.L in my portfolio?

VDPG.L and VMIG.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VDPG.L or VMIG.L?

On fees, VMIG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VDPG.L or VMIG.L?

VMIG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VDPG.L.

What is the main difference between VDPG.L and VMIG.L?

VDPG.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VMIG.L is Europe Equities. VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while VMIG.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VDPG.L and 0.10% for VMIG.L.