VDPG.L vs. GEDM.L
VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) and GEDM.L (iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - VDPG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while GEDM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VDPG.L returned 12.82%/yr vs 8.29%/yr for GEDM.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VDPG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for GEDM.L.
Performance
VDPG.L vs. GEDM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDPG.L achieves a 47.65% return, which is significantly higher than GEDM.L's 23.69% return.
VDPG.L
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 47.65%
- 6M
- 52.89%
- 1Y
- 79.33%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
GEDM.L
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- 23.69%
- 6M
- 26.20%
- 1Y
- 45.51%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- —
VDPG.L vs. GEDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 47.65% | 30.58% | -3.06% | 4.10% | -1.89% | 1.95% | 15.56% | -19.58% |
GEDM.L iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 23.69% | 24.11% | 8.80% | 4.58% | -11.07% | -0.26% | 15.84% | -16.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDPG.L and GEDM.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2019 | 0.81 |
The correlation between VDPG.L and GEDM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
VDPG.L vs. GEDM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDPG.L
GEDM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Technology
VDPG.L
GEDM.L
Financial Services
VDPG.L
GEDM.L
Industrials
VDPG.L
GEDM.L
Basic Materials
VDPG.L
GEDM.L
Consumer Cyclical
VDPG.L
GEDM.L
Real Estate
VDPG.L
GEDM.L
Healthcare
VDPG.L
GEDM.L
Consumer Defensive
VDPG.L
GEDM.L
Communication Services
VDPG.L
GEDM.L
Energy
VDPG.L
GEDM.L
Utilities
VDPG.L
GEDM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDPG.L vs. GEDM.L — Risk / Return Rank
VDPG.L
GEDM.L
VDPG.L vs. GEDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (GEDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VDPG.L | GEDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.49 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.87 | 3.93 | +1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.42 | 13.66 | +6.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VDPG.L vs. GEDM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.69%, which is greater than GEDM.L's maximum drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPG.L and GEDM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDPG.L | GEDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.69% | -38.64% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.45% | -11.53% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.18% | -15.29% | -10.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.18% | -23.30% | -2.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.74% | -3.39% | -1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.24% | -11.34% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.87% | 3.32% | +0.55% |
Volatility
VDPG.L vs. GEDM.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a higher volatility of 11.04% compared to iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (GEDM.L) at 7.49%. This indicates that VDPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GEDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDPG.L | GEDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.04% | 7.49% | +3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.69% | 15.29% | +4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.82% | 17.52% | +4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 16.07% | +5.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 18.98% | +4.29% |
VDPG.L vs. GEDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDPG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GEDM.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VDPG.L vs. GEDM.L - Dividend Comparison
VDPG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GEDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEDM.L iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.84% | 1.95% | 2.34% | 2.32% | 2.52% | 1.82% | 1.58% | 2.28% |
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDPG.L and GEDM.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDPG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for GEDM.L.
VDPG.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GEDM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while GEDM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VDPG.L and 0.18% for GEDM.L.
Find the right allocation for VDPG.L and GEDM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer