GEDM.L vs. EXCS.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GEDM.L (iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and EXCS.L (iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GEDM.L returned 18.29%/yr vs 24.90%/yr for EXCS.L. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

GEDM.L vs. EXCS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (GEDM.L) and iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EXCS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEDM.L achieves a 27.08% return, which is significantly lower than EXCS.L's 38.77% return.

GEDM.L

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 10.73%
• YTD: 27.08%
• 6M: 27.97%
• 1Y: 51.62%
• 3Y*: 18.29%
• 5Y*: 6.41%
• 10Y*: —

EXCS.L

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: 8.94%
• YTD: 38.77%
• 6M: 43.14%
• 1Y: 73.63%
• 3Y*: 24.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEDM.L vs. EXCS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GEDM.L iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	27.08%	21.46%	6.51%	2.00%	-13.11%	-0.72%
EXCS.L iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	38.77%	26.13%	5.55%	10.95%	-8.31%	2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between GEDM.L and EXCS.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2021	0.82

The correlation between GEDM.L and EXCS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

GEDM.L vs. EXCS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GEDM.L	EXCS.L
Technology	40.9%	45.1%
Financial Services	18.0%	19.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	4.5%
Industrials	7.8%	8.3%
Communication Services	6.2%	3.4%
Basic Materials	5.6%	6.8%
Healthcare	3.5%	2.2%
Energy	3.0%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	2.9%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.0%
Utilities	1.2%	2.3%

Return for Risk

GEDM.L vs. EXCS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEDM.L

GEDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
GEDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
GEDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
GEDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GEDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
GEDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

EXCS.L

EXCS.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
EXCS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EXCS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
EXCS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EXCS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
EXCS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEDM.L vs. EXCS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (GEDM.L) and iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EXCS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GEDM.L	EXCS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.06	3.88	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	4.79	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.70	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.55	6.20	-1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.80	22.70	-6.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GEDM.L vs. EXCS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEDM.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is comparable to the EXCS.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEDM.L and EXCS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GEDM.L	EXCS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.06	3.88	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	1.03	-0.51

Drawdowns

GEDM.L vs. EXCS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEDM.L drawdown since its inception was -27.84%, which is greater than EXCS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEDM.L and EXCS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	GEDM.L	EXCS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.84%	-17.51%	-10.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.47%	-11.81%	+0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.11%	-17.51%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-2.34%	+1.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.16%	-4.85%	-8.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	3.23%	+0.06%

Volatility

GEDM.L vs. EXCS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (GEDM.L) is 7.18%, while iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EXCS.L) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that GEDM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXCS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GEDM.L	EXCS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.18%	8.66%	-1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.53%	16.55%	-2.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.05%	18.88%	-1.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.77%	15.36%	+1.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.98%	15.36%	+3.62%

GEDM.L vs. EXCS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GEDM.L and EXCS.L have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GEDM.L vs. EXCS.L - Dividend Comparison

GEDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while EXCS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EXCS.L iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GEDM.L iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.02%	0.02%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GEDM.L and EXCS.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, GEDM.L and EXCS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GEDM.L or EXCS.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GEDM.L or EXCS.L?

GEDM.L and EXCS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

What is the main difference between GEDM.L and EXCS.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD.