VDPG.L vs. ESPS.L
VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) and ESPS.L (Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - VDPG.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD while ESPS.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VDPG.L returned 13.72%/yr vs 6.05%/yr for ESPS.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VDPG.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ESPS.L.
Performance
VDPG.L vs. ESPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VDPG.L is traded in GBP, while ESPS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ESPS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDPG.L achieves a 53.85% return, which is significantly higher than ESPS.L's 6.57% return.
VDPG.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 15.08%
- YTD
- 53.85%
- 6M
- 59.61%
- 1Y
- 91.14%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
ESPS.L
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- 1Y
- 14.60%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- —
VDPG.L vs. ESPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 53.85% | 30.58% | -3.05% | 4.09% | -1.89% | -0.66% |
ESPS.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 6.57% | 10.52% | 7.35% | 2.26% | 1.34% | 5.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDPG.L and ESPS.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, VDPG.L and ESPS.L have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.45, meaning their price movements have been converging.
VDPG.L vs. ESPS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDPG.L
ESPS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Technology
VDPG.L
ESPS.L
Financial Services
VDPG.L
ESPS.L
Industrials
VDPG.L
ESPS.L
Basic Materials
VDPG.L
ESPS.L
Consumer Cyclical
VDPG.L
ESPS.L
Real Estate
VDPG.L
ESPS.L
Healthcare
VDPG.L
ESPS.L
Consumer Defensive
VDPG.L
ESPS.L
Communication Services
VDPG.L
ESPS.L
Energy
VDPG.L
ESPS.L
Utilities
VDPG.L
ESPS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDPG.L vs. ESPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
VDPG.L
ESPS.L
VDPG.L vs. ESPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VDPG.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.24 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.87 | 1.93 | +4.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.62 | 5.53 | +20.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDPG.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.56 | 1.34 | +3.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.59 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.66 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
VDPG.L vs. ESPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDPG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.11%, which is greater than ESPS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDPG.L and ESPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDPG.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.11% | -17.76% | -12.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.45% | -7.52% | -5.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | -17.76% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.64% | -17.76% | +0.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -4.04% | +3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -4.55% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 2.63% | +0.98% |
Volatility
VDPG.L vs. ESPS.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) at 3.56%. This indicates that VDPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDPG.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.34% | 3.56% | +6.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.86% | 8.36% | +9.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.26% | 10.84% | +9.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 18.86% | -2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 18.86% | -0.45% |
VDPG.L vs. ESPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDPG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPS.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VDPG.L vs. ESPS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither VDPG.L nor ESPS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
VDPG.L and ESPS.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDPG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ESPS.L.
VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD, while ESPS.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VDPG.L and 0.19% for ESPS.L.
Find the right allocation for VDPG.L and ESPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer