PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDE vs. VIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDE vs. VIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDE achieves a 31.33% return, which is significantly higher than VIS's 13.89% return. Over the past 10 years, VDE has underperformed VIS with an annualized return of 9.47%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.91% annualized return.


VDE

1D
1.27%
1M
3.82%
YTD
31.33%
6M
29.93%
1Y
44.64%
3Y*
16.98%
5Y*
20.26%
10Y*
9.47%

VIS

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.03%
YTD
13.89%
6M
14.16%
1Y
24.77%
3Y*
21.62%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
13.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDE vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
31.33%7.11%6.75%0.03%62.89%56.31%-33.02%9.28%-19.95%-2.50%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
13.89%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VDE and VIS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between VDE and VIS has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VDE vs. VIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDE
VIS

Energy

99.5%
0.1%

Basic Materials

0.4%
0.1%

Industrials

0.1%
89.4%

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Technology

-

4.5%

Utilities

-

4.3%

Energy

VDE
99.5%
VIS
0.1%

Basic Materials

VDE
0.4%
VIS
0.1%

Industrials

VDE
0.1%
VIS
89.4%

Communication Services

VDE

-

VIS
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VDE

-

VIS
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

VDE

-

VIS

-

Financial Services

VDE

-

VIS
0.2%

Healthcare

VDE

-

VIS
0.0%

Real Estate

VDE

-

VIS
0.0%

Technology

VDE

-

VIS
4.5%

Utilities

VDE

-

VIS
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDE vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDE
VDE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDE vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDEVISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

2.02

+1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

8.39

+2.59

VDE vs. VIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the VIS Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDE and VIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDEVISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.51

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.70

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.68

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.52

-0.24

Drawdowns

VDE vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDE drawdown since its inception was -74.20%, which is greater than VIS's maximum drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDE and VIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDEVISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.20%

-63.51%

-10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.80%

-12.29%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.41%

-20.80%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-22.96%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.29%

-42.42%

-26.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.08%

-1.85%

-5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.96%

-8.37%

-11.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

2.96%

+1.12%

Volatility

VDE vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) at 4.56%. This indicates that VDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDEVISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

4.56%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.37%

13.57%

+2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.36%

16.52%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.42%

18.37%

+8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.93%

20.44%

+9.49%

VDE vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VDE and VIS have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDE vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison

VDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than VIS's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDE
Vanguard Energy ETF
2.39%3.11%3.23%3.34%3.65%4.13%4.76%3.42%3.35%2.90%2.31%3.17%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
0.90%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDE and VIS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VDE has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to VIS (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDE dropped -74.20% vs VIS's -63.51%.

On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 13.91% vs 9.47% for VDE. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, VIS has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 13.91% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDE and VIS have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.90% for VIS.

VDE is categorized as Energy Equities, while VIS is Industrials Equities. VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index.

VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDE and VIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer