VDE vs. GDXJ
VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) and GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDE returned 9.47%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for GDXJ. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VDE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for GDXJ.
Performance
VDE vs. GDXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDE achieves a 31.33% return, which is significantly higher than GDXJ's -10.70% return. Over the past 10 years, VDE has underperformed GDXJ with an annualized return of 9.47%, while GDXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.
VDE
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 31.33%
- 6M
- 29.93%
- 1Y
- 44.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
GDXJ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -19.25%
- YTD
- -10.70%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- 50.65%
- 3Y*
- 42.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
VDE vs. GDXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 31.33% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -10.70% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDE and GDXJ is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2009 | 0.26 |
The correlation between VDE and GDXJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VDE vs. GDXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDE
GDXJ
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
VDE
GDXJ
-
Basic Materials
VDE
GDXJ
Industrials
VDE
GDXJ
-
Communication Services
VDE
-
GDXJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
VDE
-
GDXJ
-
Consumer Defensive
VDE
-
GDXJ
-
Financial Services
VDE
-
GDXJ
-
Healthcare
VDE
-
GDXJ
-
Real Estate
VDE
-
GDXJ
-
Technology
VDE
-
GDXJ
-
Utilities
VDE
-
GDXJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDE vs. GDXJ — Risk / Return Rank
VDE
GDXJ
VDE vs. GDXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VDE | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.20 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 1.43 | +2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 3.72 | +7.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VDE | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 1.00 | +1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.39 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.26 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.05 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
VDE vs. GDXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDE drawdown since its inception was -74.20%, smaller than the maximum GDXJ drawdown of -88.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDE and GDXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDE | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.20% | -88.66% | +14.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.80% | -35.60% | +23.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.41% | -35.60% | +14.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -50.99% | +24.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.29% | -57.77% | -11.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.08% | -34.94% | +27.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.96% | -60.48% | +40.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 13.67% | -9.59% |
Volatility
VDE vs. GDXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) is 6.96%, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that VDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDE | GDXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 17.66% | -10.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | 42.71% | -26.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.36% | 50.84% | -30.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.42% | 41.34% | -14.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.93% | 44.15% | -14.22% |
VDE vs. GDXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXJ's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDE vs. GDXJ - Dividend Comparison
VDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than GDXJ's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.61% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.39% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDE and GDXJ have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to VDE (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDE dropped -74.20% vs GDXJ's -88.66%.
On 10-year performance, GDXJ leads with 11.53% vs 9.47% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.
GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 2.39% for VDE.
VDE is categorized as Energy Equities, while GDXJ is Gold. VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index, while GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDE and 0.52% for GDXJ.
VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VDE and GDXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer