PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDC vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDC vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VDC having a 10.27% return and VTI slightly higher at 10.49%. Over the past 10 years, VDC has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 7.72%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.63% annualized return.


VDC

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.01%
6M
2.65%
YTD
10.27%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
7.72%
ALL TIME*
9.44%

VTI

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.15%
6M
8.77%
YTD
10.49%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
14.63%
ALL TIME*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.48M$33.44M$37.93M
$1.06B$1.16B$1.24B

VDC vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
10.27%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
10.49%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and VTI is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.66

The correlation between VDC and VTI shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VDC vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDC
VTI

Consumer Defensive

97.1%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
9.4%

Technology

0.5%
36.1%

Basic Materials

0.4%
1.9%

Industrials

0.3%
10.2%

Healthcare

0.0%
9.7%

Communication Services

-

9.1%

Energy

-

3.2%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Consumer Defensive

VDC
97.1%
VTI
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VDC
1.1%
VTI
9.4%

Technology

VDC
0.5%
VTI
36.1%

Basic Materials

VDC
0.4%
VTI
1.9%

Industrials

VDC
0.3%
VTI
10.2%

Healthcare

VDC
0.0%
VTI
9.7%

Communication Services

VDC

-

VTI
9.1%

Energy

VDC

-

VTI
3.2%

Financial Services

VDC

-

VTI
11.8%

Real Estate

VDC

-

VTI
2.3%

Utilities

VDC

-

VTI
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDC vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VDC vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VDCVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.27

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

2.23

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.82

9.62

-7.80

VDC vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VDC vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDCVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-55.45%

+21.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-8.92%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.06%

-19.30%

+8.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-25.36%

+8.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.31%

-35.00%

+9.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.61%

-1.36%

-3.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-7.99%

+4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

2.07%

+2.88%

Volatility

VDC vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.46%. This indicates that VDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDCVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

3.46%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

10.24%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

13.10%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.44%

17.51%

-4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.76%

18.30%

-3.54%

VDC vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDC vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than VTI's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.08%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.06%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDC and VTI have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VDC has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to VTI (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 14.63% vs 7.72% for VDC. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 14.63% return vs 7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VDC.

VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.06% for VTI.

VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDC and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer