PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDC vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDC vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 7.59%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


VDC

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
5.75%
6M
4.31%
1Y
1.24%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
7.59%

VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
5.75%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and VT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between VDC and VT has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VDC vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDC
VT

Consumer Defensive

97.5%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
9.5%

Industrials

0.3%
12.0%

Basic Materials

0.3%
4.2%

Healthcare

0.0%
8.1%

Communication Services

-

8.3%

Energy

-

4.3%

Financial Services

-

15.9%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

-

27.8%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Consumer Defensive

VDC
97.5%
VT
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VDC
1.8%
VT
9.5%

Industrials

VDC
0.3%
VT
12.0%

Basic Materials

VDC
0.3%
VT
4.2%

Healthcare

VDC
0.0%
VT
8.1%

Communication Services

VDC

-

VT
8.3%

Energy

VDC

-

VT
4.3%

Financial Services

VDC

-

VT
15.9%

Real Estate

VDC

-

VT
2.4%

Technology

VDC

-

VT
27.8%

Utilities

VDC

-

VT
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDC vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDCVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.42

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

3.04

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

13.53

-13.25

VDC vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDCVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

2.31

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.69

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.74

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.44

+0.23

Drawdowns

VDC vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDCVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-50.27%

+16.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-9.67%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.78%

-16.51%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-26.38%

+9.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.31%

-34.24%

+8.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.52%

-0.88%

-7.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-7.02%

+3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

2.17%

+2.32%

Volatility

VDC vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 3.83%. This indicates that VDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDCVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

3.83%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

10.17%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

12.70%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

16.05%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

17.23%

-2.59%

VDC vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDC vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.17%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDC and VT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VDC has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.74% vs 7.59% for VDC. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VDC.

VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while VT is Global Equities. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.06% for VT.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDC and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer