PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDC vs. SILJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDC vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than SILJ's -1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has underperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 8.03%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively higher 8.82% annualized return.


VDC

1D
0.65%
1M
0.43%
YTD
10.55%
6M
8.59%
1Y
8.56%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
8.03%

SILJ

1D
3.23%
1M
-17.41%
YTD
-1.77%
6M
0.26%
1Y
84.73%
3Y*
45.21%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
8.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
10.55%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
-1.77%183.89%6.39%-5.21%-15.42%-23.21%33.00%57.06%-27.95%-5.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and SILJ is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012

0.13

The correlation between VDC and SILJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VDC vs. SILJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDC
SILJ

Consumer Defensive

97.5%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%

-

Industrials

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

0.3%
99.8%

Healthcare

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

0.0%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

VDC
97.5%
SILJ
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VDC
1.8%
SILJ

-

Industrials

VDC
0.3%
SILJ

-

Basic Materials

VDC
0.3%
SILJ
99.8%

Healthcare

VDC
0.0%
SILJ

-

Communication Services

VDC

-

SILJ
0.0%

Energy

VDC

-

SILJ

-

Financial Services

VDC

-

SILJ
0.3%

Real Estate

VDC

-

SILJ

-

Technology

VDC

-

SILJ

-

Utilities

VDC

-

SILJ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDC vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SILJ
SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VDCSILJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.26

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

2.19

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

5.65

-4.05

VDC vs. SILJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the SILJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and SILJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VDC vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and SILJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDCSILJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-79.04%

+44.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-39.16%

+29.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.78%

-39.16%

+27.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-53.55%

+37.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.31%

-70.06%

+44.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-32.56%

+28.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-41.40%

+37.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

15.17%

-10.60%

Volatility

VDC vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is 4.62%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 20.76%. This indicates that VDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDCSILJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

20.76%

-16.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

47.36%

-37.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

56.54%

-43.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

44.76%

-31.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.66%

46.41%

-31.75%

VDC vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

VDC vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than SILJ's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SILJ
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
2.04%2.00%7.26%0.01%0.05%0.36%1.23%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.52%2.46%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.08%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDC and SILJ have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SILJ has higher volatility (20.76%) compared to VDC (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs SILJ's -79.04%.

On 10-year performance, SILJ leads with 8.82% vs 8.03% for VDC. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SILJ has performed better with a 8.82% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 2.04% for SILJ.

VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SILJ is Silver. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.69% for SILJ.

SILJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDC and SILJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer