PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDC vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDC vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 24.67% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 7.74%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.91% annualized return.


VDC

1D
-0.71%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
6.86%
6M
6.42%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*
7.74%

SCHA

1D
0.77%
1M
6.39%
YTD
24.67%
6M
21.39%
1Y
45.75%
3Y*
20.54%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
11.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
6.86%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
24.67%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and SCHA is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between VDC and SCHA has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VDC vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDC
SCHA

Consumer Defensive

97.3%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
9.2%

Basic Materials

0.4%
4.1%

Industrials

0.3%
15.4%

Healthcare

0.0%
13.8%

Communication Services

-

2.3%

Energy

-

4.8%

Financial Services

-

15.4%

Real Estate

-

5.8%

Technology

-

24.3%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Consumer Defensive

VDC
97.3%
SCHA
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VDC
1.7%
SCHA
9.2%

Basic Materials

VDC
0.4%
SCHA
4.1%

Industrials

VDC
0.3%
SCHA
15.4%

Healthcare

VDC
0.0%
SCHA
13.8%

Communication Services

VDC

-

SCHA
2.3%

Energy

VDC

-

SCHA
4.8%

Financial Services

VDC

-

SCHA
15.4%

Real Estate

VDC

-

SCHA
5.8%

Technology

VDC

-

SCHA
24.3%

Utilities

VDC

-

SCHA
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDC vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VDCSCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.41

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

4.84

-4.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.09

17.72

-16.63

VDC vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VDC vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDCSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-42.41%

+8.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-9.50%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.78%

-27.29%

+15.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-30.79%

+14.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.31%

-42.41%

+17.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.56%

0.00%

-7.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-7.56%

+3.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

2.59%

+2.06%

Volatility

VDC vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is 4.82%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that VDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDCSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

6.45%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

13.80%

-3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

18.71%

-6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

22.03%

-8.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.68%

22.78%

-8.10%

VDC vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VDC vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than SCHA's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
0.96%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.15%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDC and SCHA have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHA has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to VDC (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 11.91% vs 7.74% for VDC. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VDC.

VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.96% for SCHA.

VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.04% for SCHA.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDC and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer