VDC vs. METL
VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while METL is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Sprott. VDC is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. VDC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.
Performance
VDC vs. METL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than METL's -6.10% return.
VDC
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 9.80%
- 1Y
- 7.27%
- 3Y*
- 7.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.07%
- 10Y*
- 7.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.43%
METL
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -15.36%
- 6M
- -19.31%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
VDC vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 9.80% | -3.10% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | -6.10% | 28.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDC and METL is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDC vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank
VDC
METL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VDC vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VDC | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VDC vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and METL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDC | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.24% | -28.80% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.02% | -28.80% | +23.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.74% | -10.00% | +6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | — | — |
Volatility
VDC vs. METL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDC | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 44.16% | -30.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 44.16% | -30.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 44.16% | -29.43% |
VDC vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDC vs. METL - Dividend Comparison
VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than METL's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 1.06% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDC and METL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.06% for METL.
VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while METL is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.89% for METL.
Find the right allocation for VDC and METL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer