VDC vs. IAK
VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) and IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VDC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while IAK is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VDC returned 8.03%/yr vs 12.67%/yr for IAK. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VDC charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IAK.
Performance
VDC vs. IAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly higher than IAK's 1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has underperformed IAK with an annualized return of 8.03%, while IAK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.67% annualized return.
VDC
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 8.59%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
IAK
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- 1Y
- 4.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.67%
VDC vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 10.55% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 1.11% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 26.84% | -2.86% | 25.94% | -11.48% | 14.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between VDC and IAK is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VDC and IAK has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VDC vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VDC
IAK
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
VDC
IAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
VDC
IAK
-
Industrials
VDC
IAK
-
Basic Materials
VDC
IAK
-
Healthcare
VDC
IAK
Communication Services
VDC
-
IAK
-
Energy
VDC
-
IAK
-
Financial Services
VDC
-
IAK
Real Estate
VDC
-
IAK
-
Technology
VDC
-
IAK
-
Utilities
VDC
-
IAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VDC vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank
VDC
IAK
VDC vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VDC | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.06 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 0.57 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 1.27 | +0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VDC vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and IAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VDC | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.24% | -77.38% | +43.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.28% | -7.62% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.78% | -11.58% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.55% | -14.76% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.31% | -44.95% | +19.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.37% | -0.23% | -4.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.73% | -16.11% | +12.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 3.41% | +1.16% |
Volatility
VDC vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is 4.62%, while iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that VDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VDC | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 5.49% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.02% | 10.75% | -0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 15.10% | -2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 18.14% | -4.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 20.92% | -6.26% |
VDC vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IAK's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
VDC vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison
VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than IAK's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.60% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.08% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VDC and IAK have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAK has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to VDC (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs IAK's -77.38%.
On 10-year performance, IAK leads with 12.67% vs 8.03% for VDC. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAK has performed better with a 12.67% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IAK.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.08% for VDC.
VDC is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while IAK is Financials Equities. VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.43% for IAK.
VDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VDC and IAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer