PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VDC vs. FXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VDC vs. FXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VDC achieves a 5.75% return, which is significantly higher than FXG's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, VDC has outperformed FXG with an annualized return of 7.59%, while FXG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.23% annualized return.


VDC

1D
0.61%
1M
-3.32%
YTD
5.75%
6M
4.31%
1Y
1.24%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
6.06%
10Y*
7.59%

FXG

1D
0.06%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
-1.44%
1Y
-2.29%
3Y*
0.94%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
4.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VDC vs. FXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
5.75%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%
FXG
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund
-0.18%-2.66%3.21%1.97%3.28%21.73%4.85%20.65%-11.49%7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between VDC and FXG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.80

The correlation between VDC and FXG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

VDC vs. FXG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VDC
FXG

Consumer Defensive

97.5%
79.9%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
7.9%

Industrials

0.3%
4.1%

Basic Materials

0.3%
2.0%

Healthcare

0.0%
8.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

VDC
97.5%
FXG
79.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VDC
1.8%
FXG
7.9%

Industrials

VDC
0.3%
FXG
4.1%

Basic Materials

VDC
0.3%
FXG
2.0%

Healthcare

VDC
0.0%
FXG
8.2%

Communication Services

VDC

-

FXG

-

Energy

VDC

-

FXG

-

Financial Services

VDC

-

FXG

-

Real Estate

VDC

-

FXG

-

Technology

VDC

-

FXG

-

Utilities

VDC

-

FXG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VDC vs. FXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FXG
FXG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VDC vs. FXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VDCFXGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.98

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

-0.18

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

-0.42

+0.70

VDC vs. FXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VDC Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the FXG Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VDC and FXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VDCFXGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

-0.18

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.14

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.28

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.47

+0.19

Drawdowns

VDC vs. FXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VDC drawdown since its inception was -34.24%, smaller than the maximum FXG drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VDC and FXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VDCFXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.24%

-38.69%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-12.75%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.78%

-12.75%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.55%

-15.70%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.31%

-27.54%

+2.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.52%

-12.70%

+4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-6.03%

+2.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.49%

5.41%

-0.92%

Volatility

VDC vs. FXG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund (FXG) at 3.20%. This indicates that VDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VDCFXGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

3.20%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

9.11%

+0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.36%

12.71%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

13.48%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

14.92%

-0.28%

VDC vs. FXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VDC has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FXG's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

VDC vs. FXG - Dividend Comparison

VDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than FXG's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXG
First Trust Consumer Staples AlphaDEX Fund
2.90%2.83%1.70%1.41%1.83%1.38%1.41%1.63%2.31%1.34%1.72%1.67%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.17%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


VDC and FXG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VDC has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to FXG (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VDC dropped -34.24% vs FXG's -38.69%.

On 10-year performance, VDC leads with 7.59% vs 4.23% for FXG. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VDC has performed better with a 7.59% return vs 4.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXG.

FXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.17% for VDC.

VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index, while FXG tracks StrataQuant Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VDC and 0.63% for FXG.

VDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VDC and FXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer