VCR vs. PEJ
VCR (Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF) and PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - VCR tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index while PEJ tracks the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VCR returned 13.55%/yr vs 6.65%/yr for PEJ. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VCR charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PEJ.
Performance
VCR vs. PEJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCR achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than PEJ's 2.75% return. Over the past 10 years, VCR has outperformed PEJ with an annualized return of 13.55%, while PEJ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.65% annualized return.
VCR
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 11.24%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.55%
PEJ
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 17.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 6.65%
VCR vs. PEJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.01% | 5.77% | 24.27% | 40.38% | -35.15% | 24.86% | 48.36% | 27.45% | -2.31% | 22.82% |
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 2.75% | 17.78% | 25.08% | 15.73% | -25.37% | 22.78% | -10.29% | 13.82% | -9.31% | 11.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCR and PEJ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2005 | 0.81 |
The correlation between VCR and PEJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCR vs. PEJ — Risk / Return Rank
VCR
PEJ
VCR vs. PEJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCR | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 0.96 | -0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | 1.52 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.18 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.73 | 1.79 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.28 | 4.65 | -2.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCR | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 0.96 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.19 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.27 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.33 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
VCR vs. PEJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, smaller than the maximum PEJ drawdown of -66.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and PEJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCR | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.54% | -66.03% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.59% | -10.29% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -25.75% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.20% | -35.44% | -3.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.20% | -58.96% | +19.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | -1.53% | -3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.40% | -12.32% | +2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 3.96% | +1.00% |
Volatility
VCR vs. PEJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) is 5.22%, while Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that VCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCR | PEJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | 6.23% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 13.85% | -0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 18.45% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 22.79% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 24.75% | -2.34% |
VCR vs. PEJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PEJ's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
VCR vs. PEJ - Dividend Comparison
VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, more than PEJ's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 0.39% | 0.24% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.52% |
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.73% | 0.74% | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 1.71% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VCR and PEJ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEJ has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to VCR (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCR dropped -61.54% vs PEJ's -66.03%.
On 10-year performance, VCR leads with 13.55% vs 6.65% for PEJ. On fees, VCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VCR has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VCR has performed better with a 13.55% return vs 6.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PEJ.
VCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.39% for PEJ.
VCR tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index, while PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VCR and 0.55% for PEJ.
PEJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCR and PEJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer