VCR vs. EATZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ).
VCR and EATZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VCR is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. EATZ is an actively managed fund by AdvisorShares. It was launched on Apr 20, 2021.
Performance
VCR vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VCR vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | -7.95% | 5.77% | 24.27% | 40.38% | -35.15% | 10.38% |
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | -0.50% | -6.67% | 23.21% | 25.23% | -20.68% | -5.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCR achieves a -7.95% return, which is significantly lower than EATZ's -0.50% return.
VCR
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- -7.95%
- 6M
- -8.86%
- 1Y
- 10.82%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.88%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
EATZ
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -5.62%
- 1Y
- -5.79%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VCR vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCR has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VCR vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank
VCR
EATZ
VCR vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCR | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | -0.27 | +0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | -0.26 | +1.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.97 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | -0.20 | +0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.51 | -0.39 | +2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCR | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | -0.27 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.07 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between VCR and EATZ is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VCR vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison
VCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than EATZ's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCR Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.79% | 0.74% | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 1.71% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% |
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | 0.50% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.49% | 2.35% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VCR vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCR drawdown since its inception was -61.54%, which is greater than EATZ's maximum drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCR and EATZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCR | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.54% | -34.40% | -27.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.59% | -23.21% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.14% | -17.93% | +5.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -13.39% | +3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 12.18% | -7.40% |
Volatility
VCR vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) at 5.06%. This indicates that VCR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EATZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VCR | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 5.06% | +2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.96% | 13.54% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.28% | 21.22% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.94% | 21.64% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 21.64% | +0.69% |