VCNS.TO vs. FCNVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio (VCNS.TO) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX).
VCNS.TO is an actively managed fund by Vanguard. It was launched on Jan 25, 2018. FCNVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 3, 2011.
Performance
VCNS.TO vs. FCNVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VCNS.TO vs. FCNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCNS.TO Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio | -0.16% | 8.13% | 9.74% | 10.32% | -11.72% | 5.79% | 9.46% | 12.04% | 257.13% |
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class | 1.93% | -0.28% | 14.48% | 3.53% | 8.03% | -0.96% | -0.61% | -2.06% | 13.12% |
Different Trading Currencies
VCNS.TO is traded in CAD, while FCNVX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FCNVX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCNS.TO achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly lower than FCNVX's 1.93% return.
VCNS.TO
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- -0.16%
- 6M
- -0.78%
- 1Y
- 7.06%
- 3Y*
- 7.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.07%
- 10Y*
- —
FCNVX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 1.07%
- 3Y*
- 6.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 3.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VCNS.TO vs. FCNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VCNS.TO and FCNVX have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
VCNS.TO vs. FCNVX — Risk / Return Rank
VCNS.TO
FCNVX
VCNS.TO vs. FCNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio (VCNS.TO) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCNS.TO | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.09 | +0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 0.16 | +1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.02 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 0.28 | +1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.86 | 0.53 | +4.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCNS.TO | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.09 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.86 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.59 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between VCNS.TO and FCNVX is -0.17. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
VCNS.TO vs. FCNVX - Dividend Comparison
VCNS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than FCNVX's 3.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCNS.TO Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio | 1.92% | 2.54% | 2.58% | 2.57% | 2.28% | 2.09% | 1.88% | 2.28% | 75.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class | 3.91% | 4.41% | 5.17% | 4.97% | 1.24% | 0.24% | 0.99% | 2.45% | 2.21% | 1.30% | 1.01% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
VCNS.TO vs. FCNVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCNS.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.04%, which is greater than FCNVX's maximum drawdown of -15.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCNS.TO and FCNVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCNS.TO | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.04% | -2.19% | -15.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.38% | -0.20% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.73% | -0.59% | -15.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.57% | -0.10% | -3.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -0.05% | -3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 0.05% | +1.44% |
Volatility
VCNS.TO vs. FCNVX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Conservative ETF Portfolio (VCNS.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) at 1.37%. This indicates that VCNS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VCNS.TO | FCNVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 1.37% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.92% | 3.58% | +1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.42% | 5.53% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.73% | 6.50% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.43% | 6.89% | +85.54% |