PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCLT vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCLT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCLT achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VCLT has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.31%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


VCLT

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.49%
YTD
0.99%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
7.69%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
-1.78%
10Y*
2.31%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCLT vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.99%7.18%-1.90%11.17%-25.50%-1.73%13.27%23.89%-7.04%11.70%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VCLT and VOO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.04

Over the past year, VCLT and VOO have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.04, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCLT vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCLT
VCLT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VCLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCLT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VCLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCLT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCLTVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.43

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

3.16

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.62

14.73

-11.10

VCLT vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCLT and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCLTVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

2.39

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.83

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.87

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.89

-0.49

Drawdowns

VCLT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCLT drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCLT and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCLTVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.31%

-33.99%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.25%

-8.90%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-18.69%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.31%

-24.52%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.31%

-33.99%

-0.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.36%

-0.70%

-13.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-3.69%

-4.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

1.91%

+0.22%

Volatility

VCLT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) is 2.31%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that VCLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCLTVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

2.84%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.75%

8.90%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.92%

11.80%

-3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.78%

16.81%

-4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.84%

18.01%

-5.17%

VCLT vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCLT has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCLT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VCLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.55%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.55%5.51%5.19%4.67%4.44%3.07%3.16%3.81%4.55%4.01%4.33%4.68%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCLT and VOO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to VCLT (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCLT dropped -34.31% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 2.31% for VCLT. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VCLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 2.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VCLT.

VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.55%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

VCLT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VOO is S&P 500. VCLT tracks Barclays U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VCLT and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCLT and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer