PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCLT vs. VIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCLT vs. VIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCLT achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than VIS's 15.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VCLT has underperformed VIS with an annualized return of 2.27%, while VIS has yielded a comparatively higher 14.22% annualized return.


VCLT

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.43%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.82%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
-2.06%
10Y*
2.27%

VIS

1D
0.51%
1M
1.53%
YTD
15.65%
6M
14.50%
1Y
27.46%
3Y*
21.45%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
14.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCLT vs. VIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
1.41%7.18%-1.90%11.17%-25.50%-1.73%13.27%23.89%-7.04%11.70%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
15.65%18.57%16.85%22.50%-8.57%20.80%12.34%30.09%-14.01%21.47%

Correlation

The correlation between VCLT and VIS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2009

-0.01

The correlation between VCLT and VIS shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCLT vs. VIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCLT
VCLT Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VCLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCLT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VCLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCLT Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VIS
VIS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIS Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCLT vs. VIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) and Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCLTVISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.27

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

2.24

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.75

9.28

-6.53

VCLT vs. VIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the VIS Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCLT and VIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCLT vs. VIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCLT drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum VIS drawdown of -63.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCLT and VIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCLTVISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.31%

-63.51%

+29.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.25%

-12.29%

+7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-20.80%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.31%

-22.96%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.31%

-42.42%

+8.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.00%

-0.34%

-13.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.17%

-8.37%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

2.97%

-0.81%

Volatility

VCLT vs. VIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCLT) is 2.48%, while Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that VCLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCLTVISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

6.71%

-4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.91%

14.28%

-8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.95%

17.20%

-9.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

18.48%

-5.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.85%

20.48%

-7.63%

VCLT vs. VIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCLT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VIS's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCLT vs. VIS - Dividend Comparison

VCLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than VIS's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCLT
Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.52%5.51%5.19%4.67%4.44%3.07%3.16%3.81%4.55%4.01%4.33%4.68%
VIS
Vanguard Industrials ETF
0.88%1.01%1.23%1.36%1.52%1.11%1.38%1.68%1.90%1.60%1.81%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCLT and VIS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VIS has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to VCLT (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCLT dropped -34.31% vs VIS's -63.51%.

On 10-year performance, VIS leads with 14.22% vs 2.27% for VCLT. On fees, VCLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VCLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIS has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 2.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VIS.

VCLT has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 0.88% for VIS.

VCLT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VIS is Industrials Equities. VCLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index, while VIS tracks MSCI US Investable Market Industrials 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VCLT and 0.09% for VIS.

VIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCLT and VIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer