PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCIT vs. MILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCIT vs. MILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCIT achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than MILK's 2.18% return.


VCIT

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.07%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
2.93%

MILK

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.10%
YTD
2.18%
6M
1.55%
1Y
9.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCIT vs. MILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.18%9.34%0.07%
MILK
Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF
2.18%7.49%-0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between VCIT and MILK is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.91

The correlation between VCIT and MILK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCIT vs. MILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

MILK
MILK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MILK Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCIT vs. MILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VCITMILKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

1.78

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

2.59

-0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.47

-0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.95

8.90

-1.95

VCIT vs. MILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the MILK Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCIT and MILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VCITMILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

1.78

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.97

-0.21

Drawdowns

VCIT vs. MILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCIT drawdown since its inception was -20.56%, which is greater than MILK's maximum drawdown of -6.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCIT and MILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCITMILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.56%

-6.16%

-14.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-3.75%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-0.24%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-1.09%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.04%

-0.16%

Volatility

VCIT vs. MILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) is 1.38%, while Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) has a volatility of 1.58%. This indicates that VCIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCITMILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

1.58%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.06%

3.78%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

5.21%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.61%

6.69%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

6.69%

-0.41%

VCIT vs. MILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCIT has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than MILK's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCIT vs. MILK - Dividend Comparison

VCIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, less than MILK's 7.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MILK
Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF
7.04%6.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.80%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VCIT and MILK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MILK has higher volatility (1.58%) compared to VCIT (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCIT dropped -20.56% vs MILK's -6.16%.

On 1-year performance, MILK leads with 9.23% vs 6.13% for VCIT. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VCIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MILK has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 6.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MILK.

MILK has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 4.80% for VCIT.

VCIT tracks Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index, while MILK tracks Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VCIT and 0.49% for MILK.

MILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCIT and MILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer