MILK vs. IBND

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MILK (Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF) and IBND (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - MILK tracks the Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index while IBND tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MILK returned 4.12% vs -0.02% for IBND. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MILK charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IBND.

Performance

MILK vs. IBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MILK achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than IBND's -1.95% return.

MILK

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -1.69%
• 6M: 0.04%
• YTD: 0.94%
• 1Y: 4.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.21%

IBND

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: -0.16%
• 6M: -3.66%
• YTD: -1.95%
• 1Y: -0.02%
• 3Y*: 5.22%
• 5Y*: -1.45%
• 10Y*: 0.48%
• ALL TIME*: 1.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF	$2.13M	$1.63M	$2.53M
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF	$195.76K	$144.48K	$113.75K

MILK vs. IBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF	0.94%	7.49%	-1.49%
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF	-1.95%	16.17%	-1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MILK and IBND is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2024	0.45

The correlation between MILK and IBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MILK vs. IBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MILK

MILK Risk / Return Rank: 37
MILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
MILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
MILK Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MILK Martin Ratio Rank: 40

IBND

IBND Risk / Return Rank: 13
IBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
IBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
IBND Omega Ratio Rank: 13
IBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
IBND Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MILK vs. IBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MILK	IBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	0.16	+0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	0.28	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.03	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	0.18	+1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.33	0.40	+3.93

MILK vs. IBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MILK Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the IBND Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MILK and IBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MILK vs. IBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MILK drawdown since its inception was -6.16%, smaller than the maximum IBND drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MILK and IBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	MILK	IBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-35.62%	+29.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.75%	-6.75%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.49%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.13%	-10.25%	+8.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.13%	-10.63%	+9.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	3.07%	-1.96%

Volatility

MILK vs. IBND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF (MILK) is 1.15%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF (IBND) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that MILK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MILK	IBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.15%	1.99%	-0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.82%	6.26%	-2.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.01%	7.78%	-2.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.55%	9.76%	-3.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.55%	8.91%	-2.36%

MILK vs. IBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

MILK has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than IBND's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MILK vs. IBND - Dividend Comparison

MILK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than IBND's 2.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF	2.56%	2.49%	2.61%	2.08%	0.54%	0.38%	0.45%	0.67%	0.71%	0.34%	0.01%	0.01%
MILK Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF	7.07%	6.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MILK and IBND in my portfolio?

MILK and IBND have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MILK or IBND?

IBND has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to MILK (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MILK dropped -6.16% vs IBND's -35.62%.

Which ETF is better, MILK or IBND?

On 1-year performance, MILK leads with 4.12% vs -0.02% for IBND. On fees, MILK is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MILK has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MILK or IBND?

Over the 1-year period, MILK has performed better with a 4.12% return vs -0.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MILK or IBND?

MILK is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MILK or IBND?

MILK has the higher dividend yield at 7.07%, compared with 2.56% for IBND.

What is the main difference between MILK and IBND?

MILK tracks Solactive Pacer US Cash Cows Bond Index, while IBND tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate x USD >$1B: Corporate Bond. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for MILK and 0.50% for IBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.