PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCIT vs. IGHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCIT vs. IGHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCIT achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than IGHG's 2.20% return. Over the past 10 years, VCIT has underperformed IGHG with an annualized return of 2.65%, while IGHG has yielded a comparatively higher 4.76% annualized return.


VCIT

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.31%
6M
-0.88%
YTD
-0.64%
1Y
2.20%
3Y*
5.78%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*
2.65%
ALL TIME*
4.24%

IGHG

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.05%
6M
1.60%
YTD
2.20%
1Y
4.84%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
4.76%
ALL TIME*
3.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.19M$1.15M$1.90M
$656.43M$641.05M$718.26M

VCIT vs. IGHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
-0.64%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.77%9.46%14.10%-1.74%5.31%
IGHG
ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged
2.20%5.65%9.20%11.58%-0.90%0.88%0.61%12.73%-3.96%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VCIT and IGHG is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2013

0.01

The correlation between VCIT and IGHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCIT vs. IGHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

IGHG
IGHG Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IGHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGHG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IGHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGHG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VCIT vs. IGHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCITIGHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.26

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

2.66

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.91

9.17

-6.26

VCIT vs. IGHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCIT Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the IGHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCIT and IGHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCIT vs. IGHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCIT drawdown since its inception was -20.56%, smaller than the maximum IGHG drawdown of -25.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCIT and IGHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCITIGHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.56%

-25.16%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-1.75%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.29%

-3.74%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.51%

-8.75%

-11.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

-25.16%

+4.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-0.17%

-1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.14%

-2.27%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.51%

+0.55%

Volatility

VCIT vs. IGHG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) at 0.58%. This indicates that VCIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCITIGHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.12%

0.58%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.29%

2.06%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

3.32%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

4.99%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

7.31%

-1.03%

VCIT vs. IGHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCIT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IGHG's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VCIT vs. IGHG - Dividend Comparison

VCIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than IGHG's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGHG
ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged
4.67%5.14%5.06%4.99%3.55%2.50%2.79%3.48%4.13%3.36%3.37%3.65%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.46%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCIT and IGHG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCIT has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to IGHG (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCIT dropped -20.56% vs IGHG's -25.16%.

On 10-year performance, IGHG leads with 4.76% vs 2.65% for VCIT. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IGHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGHG has performed better with a 4.76% return vs 2.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IGHG.

IGHG has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 4.46% for VCIT.

VCIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index, while IGHG tracks Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VCIT and 0.30% for IGHG.

IGHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCIT and IGHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer