VCIT vs. EAGG
VCIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF) and EAGG (iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VCIT is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index, while EAGG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VCIT returned 1.22%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for EAGG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VCIT charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EAGG.
Performance
VCIT vs. EAGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCIT achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than EAGG's 0.26% return.
VCIT
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
EAGG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 5.11%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.01%
- 10Y*
- —
VCIT vs. EAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 9.34% | 3.20% | 8.98% | -13.98% | -1.77% | 9.46% | 14.10% | 1.30% |
EAGG iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.26% | 7.18% | 1.12% | 5.58% | -13.63% | -1.30% | 7.40% | 8.68% | 2.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCIT and EAGG is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between VCIT and EAGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCIT vs. EAGG — Risk / Return Rank
VCIT
EAGG
VCIT vs. EAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) and iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCIT | EAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.24 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 1.86 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.95 | 5.75 | +1.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCIT | EAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.35 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.00 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.38 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
VCIT vs. EAGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCIT drawdown since its inception was -20.56%, which is greater than EAGG's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCIT and EAGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCIT | EAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.56% | -18.74% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | -2.75% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.11% | -6.20% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.56% | -17.98% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -2.79% | +1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -6.05% | +2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 0.89% | -0.01% |
Volatility
VCIT vs. EAGG - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) at 1.26%. This indicates that VCIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCIT | EAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.38% | 1.26% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.06% | 2.67% | +0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.10% | 3.79% | +0.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.61% | 6.03% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.28% | 5.50% | +0.78% |
VCIT vs. EAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCIT has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than EAGG's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VCIT vs. EAGG - Dividend Comparison
VCIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, more than EAGG's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAGG iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.01% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.24% | 2.07% | 1.09% | 1.82% | 3.17% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.80% | 4.62% | 4.43% | 3.72% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 2.78% | 3.37% | 3.61% | 3.21% | 3.29% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VCIT and EAGG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VCIT has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to EAGG (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCIT dropped -20.56% vs EAGG's -18.74%.
On 5-year performance, VCIT leads with 1.22% vs 0.01% for EAGG. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, EAGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VCIT has performed better with a 1.22% return vs 0.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCIT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for EAGG.
VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 4.01% for EAGG.
VCIT is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while EAGG is Intermediate Core Bond. VCIT tracks Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index, while EAGG tracks Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VCIT and 0.10% for EAGG.
VCIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCIT and EAGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer