PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EAGG vs. FIBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EAGG vs. FIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) and iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EAGG achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly higher than FIBR's 0.33% return.


EAGG

1D
0.04%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.45%
6M
0.47%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
0.12%
10Y*

FIBR

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.43%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
6.80%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
2.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EAGG vs. FIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EAGG
iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF
0.45%7.18%1.12%5.58%-13.63%-1.30%7.40%8.68%2.35%
FIBR
iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF
0.33%8.32%6.04%8.22%-13.57%-1.00%3.31%10.03%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between EAGG and FIBR is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2018

0.76

The correlation between EAGG and FIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EAGG vs. FIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EAGG
EAGG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
EAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
EAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FIBR
FIBR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EAGG vs. FIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) and iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EAGGFIBRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

1.51

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

2.15

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.90

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.66

5.88

-0.22

EAGG vs. FIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EAGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the FIBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EAGG and FIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EAGGFIBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

1.51

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.29

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.51

-0.12

Drawdowns

EAGG vs. FIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EAGG drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, roughly equal to the maximum FIBR drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EAGG and FIBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EAGGFIBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-18.47%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-2.99%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.20%

-3.08%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.98%

-18.47%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-1.52%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-3.28%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.97%

-0.09%

Volatility

EAGG vs. FIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) is 1.29%, while iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF (FIBR) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that EAGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EAGGFIBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

1.42%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

3.13%

-0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

3.78%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.03%

5.63%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.50%

4.95%

+0.55%

EAGG vs. FIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EAGG has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FIBR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EAGG vs. FIBR - Dividend Comparison

EAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than FIBR's 4.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAGG
iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF
4.00%3.92%3.93%3.24%2.07%1.09%1.82%3.17%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FIBR
iShares U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Systematic ETF
4.61%4.78%5.04%4.44%3.27%1.92%2.57%3.27%3.61%2.74%2.92%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


EAGG and FIBR have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIBR has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to EAGG (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EAGG dropped -18.74% vs FIBR's -18.47%.

On 5-year performance, FIBR leads with 1.63% vs 0.12% for EAGG. On fees, EAGG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, EAGG has been the lower-risk option at 1.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FIBR has performed better with a 1.63% return vs 0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAGG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FIBR.

FIBR has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 4.00% for EAGG.

EAGG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while FIBR is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. EAGG tracks Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Focus Index, while FIBR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Fixed Income Balanced Risk Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for EAGG and 0.25% for FIBR.

FIBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EAGG and FIBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer