VCEB vs. GIGB
VCEB (Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF) and GIGB (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds - VCEB tracks the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corp SRI Select Index while GIGB tracks the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VCEB returned 0.38%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for GIGB. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VCEB charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for GIGB.
Performance
VCEB vs. GIGB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCEB achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than GIGB's 0.99% return.
VCEB
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 5.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- —
GIGB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
VCEB vs. GIGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VCEB Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF | 0.56% | 7.48% | 2.23% | 8.52% | -15.15% | -1.99% | 2.45% |
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.99% | 7.58% | 1.68% | 8.80% | -15.80% | -1.64% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCEB and GIGB is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.98 |
The correlation between VCEB and GIGB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCEB vs. GIGB — Risk / Return Rank
VCEB
GIGB
VCEB vs. GIGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) and Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VCEB | GIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.84 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | 5.74 | -0.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VCEB vs. GIGB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCEB drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, roughly equal to the maximum GIGB drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCEB and GIGB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCEB | GIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.60% | -22.25% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -2.87% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.09% | -6.69% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.39% | -22.25% | +0.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -0.64% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -5.60% | -2.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.92% | +0.01% |
Volatility
VCEB vs. GIGB - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) and Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) have volatilities of 1.43% and 1.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCEB | GIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.43% | 1.43% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.21% | 3.23% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22% | 4.31% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.84% | 7.25% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.65% | 7.66% | -1.01% |
VCEB vs. GIGB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VCEB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GIGB's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VCEB vs. GIGB - Dividend Comparison
VCEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, which matches GIGB's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.60% | 4.69% | 4.45% | 3.67% | 3.12% | 2.25% | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.31% | 1.55% |
VCEB Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF | 4.64% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 3.70% | 2.84% | 1.69% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, VCEB and GIGB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GIGB has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to VCEB (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCEB dropped -21.60% vs GIGB's -22.25%.
On 5-year performance, VCEB leads with 0.38% vs 0.31% for GIGB. On fees, VCEB is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VCEB has performed better with a 0.38% return vs 0.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCEB is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for GIGB.
VCEB has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 4.60% for GIGB.
VCEB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corp SRI Select Index, while GIGB tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VCEB and 0.14% for GIGB.
GIGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCEB and GIGB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer