PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VCEB vs. BSCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VCEB vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VCEB achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than BSCR's 1.57% return.


VCEB

1D
-0.39%
1M
-1.16%
6M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.60%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*

BSCR

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.25%
6M
1.57%
YTD
1.57%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VCEB vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VCEB
Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF
-0.60%7.48%2.23%8.52%-15.15%-1.99%2.45%
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
1.57%5.77%4.52%6.41%-9.56%-1.72%2.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VCEB and BSCR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between VCEB and BSCR has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VCEB vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VCEB
VCEB Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VCEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCEB Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VCEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCEB Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BSCR
BSCR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BSCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BSCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VCEB vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VCEBBSCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

2.16

-1.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

10.40

-9.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.43

45.90

-42.47

VCEB vs. BSCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VCEB Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the BSCR Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VCEB and BSCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VCEB vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VCEB drawdown since its inception was -21.60%, which is greater than BSCR's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCEB and BSCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VCEBBSCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.60%

-17.26%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-0.42%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.09%

-2.27%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.39%

-14.87%

-6.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-0.03%

-1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-3.30%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.09%

+0.87%

Volatility

VCEB vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) at 0.20%. This indicates that VCEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VCEBBSCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

0.20%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.33%

0.60%

+2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.21%

1.01%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.85%

4.08%

+2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.63%

5.32%

+1.31%

VCEB vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VCEB has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCR's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VCEB vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison

VCEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than BSCR's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BSCR
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
4.28%4.26%4.27%3.74%2.65%2.12%2.46%3.11%3.35%0.78%
VCEB
Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF
4.72%4.57%4.47%3.70%2.84%1.69%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VCEB and BSCR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCEB has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to BSCR (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCEB dropped -21.60% vs BSCR's -17.26%.

On 5-year performance, BSCR leads with 1.36% vs -0.03% for VCEB. On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCR has been the lower-risk option at 0.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSCR has performed better with a 1.36% return vs -0.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VCEB.

VCEB has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.28% for BSCR.

VCEB tracks Bloomberg Barclays MSCI US Corp SRI Select Index, while BSCR tracks NASDAQ Bulletshares® USD Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VCEB and 0.10% for BSCR.

BSCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VCEB and BSCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer