PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBR vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBR vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 30.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VBR has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 10.49%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.62% annualized return.


VBR

1D
0.76%
1M
2.07%
YTD
12.51%
6M
12.70%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
8.12%
10Y*
10.49%

VGT

1D
-0.88%
1M
14.99%
YTD
30.49%
6M
28.76%
1Y
58.31%
3Y*
33.33%
5Y*
22.01%
10Y*
25.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBR vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
12.51%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
30.49%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between VBR and VGT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between VBR and VGT has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VBR vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBR
VGT

Industrials

18.1%
0.4%

Financial Services

17.6%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
0.1%

Technology

10.6%
98.5%

Real Estate

10.1%

-

Healthcare

7.9%
0.0%

Basic Materials

6.3%
0.0%

Energy

5.2%
0.3%

Utilities

4.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.0%

-

Communication Services

2.5%
0.5%

Industrials

VBR
18.1%
VGT
0.4%

Financial Services

VBR
17.6%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VBR
12.4%
VGT
0.1%

Technology

VBR
10.6%
VGT
98.5%

Real Estate

VBR
10.1%
VGT

-

Healthcare

VBR
7.9%
VGT
0.0%

Basic Materials

VBR
6.3%
VGT
0.0%

Energy

VBR
5.2%
VGT
0.3%

Utilities

VBR
4.8%
VGT

-

Consumer Defensive

VBR
4.0%
VGT

-

Communication Services

VBR
2.5%
VGT
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBR vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBR vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBRVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

3.57

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.96

11.41

-0.45

VBR vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBR and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBRVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

2.85

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.88

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

1.04

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.68

-0.26

Drawdowns

VBR vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBRVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.98%

-54.63%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-16.40%

+7.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-27.23%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-35.07%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

-35.07%

-10.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.35%

+2.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-7.95%

-0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

5.13%

-2.63%

Volatility

VBR vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is 3.89%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that VBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBRVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

6.51%

-2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

16.09%

-5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

20.55%

-5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

25.17%

-5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

24.60%

-2.87%

VBR vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBR vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.75%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBR and VGT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to VBR (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.62% vs 10.49% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.62% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBR and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer