VBR vs. VGT
VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBR returned 10.49%/yr vs 25.62%/yr for VGT. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
VBR vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 30.49% return. Over the past 10 years, VBR has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 10.49%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.62% annualized return.
VBR
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 12.51%
- 6M
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 27.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 10.49%
VGT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 14.99%
- YTD
- 30.49%
- 6M
- 28.76%
- 1Y
- 58.31%
- 3Y*
- 33.33%
- 5Y*
- 22.01%
- 10Y*
- 25.62%
VBR vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 12.51% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 30.49% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBR and VGT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VBR and VGT has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VBR vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBR
VGT
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Industrials
VBR
VGT
Financial Services
VBR
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
VBR
VGT
Technology
VBR
VGT
Real Estate
VBR
VGT
-
Healthcare
VBR
VGT
Basic Materials
VBR
VGT
Energy
VBR
VGT
Utilities
VBR
VGT
-
Consumer Defensive
VBR
VGT
-
Communication Services
VBR
VGT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBR vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
VBR
VGT
VBR vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBR | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.46 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 3.57 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.96 | 11.41 | -0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBR | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 2.85 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.88 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 1.04 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.68 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
VBR vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBR | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -54.63% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -16.40% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -27.23% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -35.07% | +10.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.28% | -35.07% | -10.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.35% | +2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -7.95% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 5.13% | -2.63% |
Volatility
VBR vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is 3.89%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that VBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBR | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.89% | 6.51% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | 16.09% | -5.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.14% | 20.55% | -5.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 25.17% | -5.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 24.60% | -2.87% |
VBR vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBR vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.75% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBR and VGT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to VBR (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.62% vs 10.49% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.62% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.
VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.
VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.09% for VGT.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBR and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer