VBR vs. VEA
VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBR returned 10.53%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for VEA. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
VBR vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 11.67% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VBR having a 10.53% annualized return and VEA not far behind at 10.17%.
VBR
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 11.67%
- 6M
- 11.95%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
VEA
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 6M
- 18.15%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
VBR vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 11.67% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.92% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBR and VEA is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.76 |
The correlation between VBR and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
VBR vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBR
VEA
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
VBR
VEA
Financial Services
VBR
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
VBR
VEA
Technology
VBR
VEA
Real Estate
VBR
VEA
Healthcare
VBR
VEA
Basic Materials
VBR
VEA
Energy
VBR
VEA
Utilities
VBR
VEA
Consumer Defensive
VBR
VEA
Communication Services
VBR
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBR vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
VBR
VEA
VBR vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VBR | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.81 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 10.94 | -0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBR | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 2.09 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.58 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.59 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.25 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
VBR vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, roughly equal to the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBR | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -60.68% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -11.63% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -13.45% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -29.71% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.28% | -35.73% | -9.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.90% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -13.29% | +5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 2.98% | -0.48% |
Volatility
VBR vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is 3.96%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that VBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBR | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 5.66% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 13.32% | -2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 15.66% | -0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 16.55% | +3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 17.36% | +4.37% |
VBR vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBR vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.76% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBR and VEA have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to VBR (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.53% vs 10.17% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.53% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VBR.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.76% for VBR.
VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.03% for VEA.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBR and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer