VBR vs. USVM
VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) and USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while USVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VBR returned 8.85%/yr vs 10.38%/yr for USVM. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VBR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USVM.
Performance
VBR vs. USVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 18.69% return.
VBR
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
USVM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 33.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- —
VBR vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 13.42% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 4.03% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 18.69% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBR and USVM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VBR and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VBR vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBR
USVM
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
VBR
USVM
Industrials
VBR
USVM
Consumer Cyclical
VBR
USVM
Technology
VBR
USVM
Real Estate
VBR
USVM
Healthcare
VBR
USVM
Basic Materials
VBR
USVM
Utilities
VBR
USVM
Energy
VBR
USVM
Consumer Defensive
VBR
USVM
Communication Services
VBR
USVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBR vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank
VBR
USVM
VBR vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBR | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.39 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 4.06 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 15.28 | -4.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBR vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and USVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBR | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.98% | -42.38% | -19.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -8.36% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.19% | -24.34% | +0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -25.27% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -0.29% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -7.86% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 2.22% | +0.28% |
Volatility
VBR vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) have volatilities of 3.97% and 4.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBR | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 4.10% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.66% | 11.04% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 14.99% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 19.64% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 21.97% | -0.22% |
VBR vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBR vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison
VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than USVM's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.77% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VBR and USVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
USVM has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to VBR (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs USVM's -42.38%.
On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 10.38% vs 8.85% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 10.38% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USVM.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.73% for VBR.
VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.29% for USVM.
USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBR and USVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer