PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBR vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBR vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 13.42% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 18.69% return.


VBR

1D
0.18%
1M
2.65%
YTD
13.42%
6M
11.41%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
16.95%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
11.02%

USVM

1D
0.43%
1M
4.01%
YTD
18.69%
6M
16.33%
1Y
33.77%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBR vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
13.42%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%4.03%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
18.69%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VBR and USVM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.95

The correlation between VBR and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBR vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBR
USVM

Financial Services

17.5%
21.6%

Industrials

17.4%
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.5%
11.3%

Technology

12.1%
12.5%

Real Estate

10.5%
12.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
11.3%

Basic Materials

6.0%
1.6%

Utilities

4.6%
5.9%

Energy

4.3%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
4.8%

Communication Services

2.8%
2.5%

Financial Services

VBR
17.5%
USVM
21.6%

Industrials

VBR
17.4%
USVM
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VBR
12.5%
USVM
11.3%

Technology

VBR
12.1%
USVM
12.5%

Real Estate

VBR
10.5%
USVM
12.1%

Healthcare

VBR
8.3%
USVM
11.3%

Basic Materials

VBR
6.0%
USVM
1.6%

Utilities

VBR
4.6%
USVM
5.9%

Energy

VBR
4.3%
USVM
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

VBR
4.0%
USVM
4.8%

Communication Services

VBR
2.8%
USVM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBR vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBR vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBRUSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

4.06

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

15.28

-4.17

VBR vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBR and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBR vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBRUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.98%

-42.38%

-19.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.85%

-8.36%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-24.34%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-25.27%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.29%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-7.86%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.22%

+0.28%

Volatility

VBR vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) have volatilities of 3.97% and 4.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBRUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

4.10%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

11.04%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.33%

14.99%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.73%

19.64%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.75%

21.97%

-0.22%

VBR vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBR vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than USVM's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.77%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.73%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VBR and USVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USVM has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to VBR (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 10.38% vs 8.85% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 10.38% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USVM.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.73% for VBR.

VBR is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBR and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer