VBR vs. RZV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) and RZV (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds - VBR tracks the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index while RZV tracks the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBR returned 10.49%/yr vs 10.50%/yr for RZV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VBR charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RZV.

Performance

VBR vs. RZV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBR achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than RZV's 19.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VBR having a 10.49% annualized return and RZV not far ahead at 10.50%.

VBR

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 2.07%
• YTD: 12.51%
• 6M: 12.70%
• 1Y: 27.37%
• 3Y*: 17.22%
• 5Y*: 8.12%
• 10Y*: 10.49%

RZV

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 19.32%
• 6M: 17.69%
• 1Y: 45.33%
• 3Y*: 19.15%
• 5Y*: 9.13%
• 10Y*: 10.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBR vs. RZV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF	12.51%	9.09%	12.40%	16.00%	-9.38%	28.08%	5.90%	22.78%	-12.28%	11.81%
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF	19.32%	8.65%	5.06%	22.97%	-6.80%	45.95%	-3.88%	22.29%	-19.66%	1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between VBR and RZV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2006	0.91

The correlation between VBR and RZV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBR vs. RZV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VBR	RZV
Industrials	18.1%	15.7%
Financial Services	17.6%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	26.1%
Technology	10.6%	8.9%
Real Estate	10.1%	5.0%
Healthcare	7.9%	8.8%
Basic Materials	6.3%	6.4%
Energy	5.2%	9.7%
Utilities	4.8%	0.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	7.7%
Communication Services	2.5%	4.2%

Return for Risk

VBR vs. RZV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBR

VBR Risk / Return Rank: 58
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 52
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 62

RZV

RZV Risk / Return Rank: 68
RZV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
RZV Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
RZV Omega Ratio Rank: 62
RZV Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RZV Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBR vs. RZV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VBR	RZV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	2.21	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	3.10	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.37	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	3.63	-0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.96	11.80	-0.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VBR vs. RZV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the RZV Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBR and RZV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VBR	RZV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	2.21	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.38	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.39	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.27	+0.15

Drawdowns

VBR vs. RZV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBR drawdown since its inception was -61.98%, smaller than the maximum RZV drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBR and RZV.

Drawdown Indicators

	VBR	RZV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.98%	-77.11%	+15.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.85%	-12.56%	+3.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.19%	-29.81%	+5.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.19%	-29.81%	+5.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.28%	-60.42%	+15.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.27%	-13.60%	+5.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	3.85%	-1.35%

Volatility

VBR vs. RZV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) is 3.89%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF (RZV) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that VBR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RZV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VBR	RZV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.89%	5.27%	-1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.47%	13.71%	-3.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.14%	20.67%	-5.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.77%	24.37%	-4.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.73%	27.03%	-5.30%

VBR vs. RZV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBR has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RZV's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

VBR vs. RZV - Dividend Comparison

VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than RZV's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RZV Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Value ETF	1.33%	1.59%	1.14%	1.13%	1.43%	0.86%	0.63%	1.03%	2.03%	1.02%	0.46%	1.24%
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF	1.75%	1.95%	1.98%	2.12%	2.03%	1.75%	1.68%	2.06%	2.35%	1.79%	1.77%	1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VBR and RZV in my portfolio?

VBR and RZV have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VBR or RZV?

RZV has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to VBR (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBR dropped -61.98% vs RZV's -77.11%.

Which ETF is better, VBR or RZV?

On 10-year performance, RZV leads with 10.50% vs 10.49% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VBR or RZV?

Over the 10-year period, RZV has performed better with a 10.50% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VBR or RZV?

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RZV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VBR or RZV?

VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.33% for RZV.

What is the main difference between VBR and RZV?

VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index, while RZV tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Value. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBR and 0.35% for RZV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RZV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.