VBLLX vs. META

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VBLLX (Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares) is Total Bond Market fund managed by Vanguard, while META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VBLLX returned 0.86%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for META. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

VBLLX vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBLLX achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than META's -5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, VBLLX has underperformed META with an annualized return of 0.86%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.

VBLLX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: -0.46%
• 1Y: 7.09%
• 3Y*: 1.98%
• 5Y*: -3.19%
• 10Y*: 0.86%

META

• 1D: 4.24%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: -5.54%
• 6M: -2.44%
• 1Y: -6.29%
• 3Y*: 32.06%
• 5Y*: 13.70%
• 10Y*: 18.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBLLX vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VBLLX Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares	0.46%	6.60%	-4.12%	7.13%	-27.20%	-3.08%	16.27%	19.15%	-4.71%	10.89%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-5.54%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VBLLX and META is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012	-0.05

The correlation between VBLLX and META shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VBLLX vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBLLX

VBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 11
VBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
VBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
VBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
VBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
VBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 32
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
META Omega Ratio Rank: 29
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
META Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBLLX vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VBLLX	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	-0.18	+1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	-0.01	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.00	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	-0.19	+1.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.08	-0.41	+3.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VBLLX vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBLLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBLLX and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VBLLX	META	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	-0.18	+1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.25	0.31	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07	0.47	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.56	-0.20

Drawdowns

VBLLX vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBLLX drawdown since its inception was -38.42%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBLLX and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	VBLLX	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.42%	-76.74%	+38.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.98%	-33.30%	+27.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.90%	-34.15%	+19.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.29%	-76.74%	+40.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.42%	-76.74%	+38.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.51%	-20.96%	-3.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.20%	-15.25%	+6.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.31%	15.47%	-13.16%

Volatility

VBLLX vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX) is 2.73%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that VBLLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VBLLX	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	8.84%	-6.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.83%	26.58%	-20.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.32%	35.23%	-26.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.90%	43.99%	-31.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.59%	38.64%	-27.05%

Dividends

VBLLX vs. META - Dividend Comparison

VBLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than META's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.34%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VBLLX Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares	4.77%	4.66%	4.64%	3.75%	4.16%	2.89%	5.84%	3.62%	3.82%	3.69%	4.19%	4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VBLLX and META in my portfolio?

VBLLX and META have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VBLLX or META?

META has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to VBLLX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBLLX dropped -38.42% vs META's -76.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VBLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.