VBLLX vs. META
VBLLX (Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares) is Total Bond Market fund managed by Vanguard, while META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VBLLX returned 0.08%/yr vs 16.88%/yr for META. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
VBLLX vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBLLX achieves a -3.40% return, which is significantly higher than META's -10.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VBLLX has underperformed META with an annualized return of 0.08%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 16.88% annualized return.
VBLLX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -3.76%
- 6M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- -3.40%
- 1Y
- -1.14%
- 3Y*
- 1.12%
- 5Y*
- -5.26%
- 10Y*
- 0.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.79%
META
- 1D
- 6.02%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- -16.30%
- YTD
- -10.42%
- 1Y
- -21.04%
- 3Y*
- 24.21%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 16.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.72B | $11.90B | $11.03B | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
VBLLX vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBLLX Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares | -3.40% | 6.60% | -4.12% | 7.13% | -27.20% | -3.08% | 16.27% | 19.15% | -4.71% | 10.89% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -10.42% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBLLX and META is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012 | -0.05 |
The correlation between VBLLX and META shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBLLX vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
VBLLX
META
VBLLX vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBLLX | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.93 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | -0.63 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | -1.15 | +1.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBLLX vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBLLX drawdown since its inception was -38.42%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBLLX and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBLLX | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.42% | -76.74% | +38.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.35% | -33.30% | +26.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.55% | -34.15% | +22.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.29% | -76.74% | +40.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.42% | -76.74% | +38.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.42% | -25.04% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.33% | -15.90% | +6.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 18.31% | -15.60% |
Volatility
VBLLX vs. META - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX) is 2.07%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 15.82%. This indicates that VBLLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBLLX | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.07% | 15.82% | -13.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.06% | 30.76% | -24.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.89% | 38.57% | -30.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 44.77% | -31.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 39.16% | -27.61% |
Dividends
VBLLX vs. META - Dividend Comparison
VBLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than META's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VBLLX Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares | 4.57% | 4.66% | 4.64% | 3.75% | 4.16% | 2.89% | 5.84% | 3.62% | 3.82% | 3.69% | 4.19% | 4.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBLLX and META have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
META has higher volatility (15.82%) compared to VBLLX (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBLLX dropped -38.42% vs META's -76.74%.
VBLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBLLX and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer