PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBLLX vs. FMSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBLLX vs. FMSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX) and Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBLLX achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than FMSFX's 0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, VBLLX has underperformed FMSFX with an annualized return of 0.86%, while FMSFX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.30% annualized return.


VBLLX

1D
0.19%
1M
1.58%
YTD
0.46%
6M
-0.46%
1Y
7.09%
3Y*
1.98%
5Y*
-3.19%
10Y*
0.86%

FMSFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.07%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*
1.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBLLX vs. FMSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBLLX
Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.46%6.60%-4.12%7.13%-27.20%-3.08%16.27%19.15%-4.71%10.89%
FMSFX
Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund
0.97%8.29%1.00%4.91%-12.61%-1.20%4.41%6.43%0.79%2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between VBLLX and FMSFX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2006

0.76

The correlation between VBLLX and FMSFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.89 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBLLX vs. FMSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBLLX
VBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
VBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
VBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FMSFX
FMSFX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FMSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FMSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBLLX vs. FMSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX) and Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBLLXFMSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.32

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

2.50

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.08

8.25

-5.17

VBLLX vs. FMSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBLLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the FMSFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBLLX and FMSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBLLXFMSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.76

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.25

0.03

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

0.25

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

1.02

-0.67

Drawdowns

VBLLX vs. FMSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBLLX drawdown since its inception was -38.42%, which is greater than FMSFX's maximum drawdown of -18.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBLLX and FMSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBLLXFMSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.42%

-18.81%

-19.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.98%

-2.81%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

-8.04%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.29%

-18.66%

-17.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.42%

-18.81%

-19.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.51%

-1.11%

-23.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-1.92%

-7.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

0.85%

+1.46%

Volatility

VBLLX vs. FMSFX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund (FMSFX) at 1.49%. This indicates that VBLLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBLLXFMSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

1.49%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.83%

2.80%

+3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.32%

3.99%

+4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.90%

6.79%

+6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.59%

5.13%

+6.46%

VBLLX vs. FMSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBLLX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FMSFX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBLLX vs. FMSFX - Dividend Comparison

VBLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than FMSFX's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMSFX
Fidelity Mortgage Securities Fund
3.90%3.93%4.12%3.50%1.43%0.62%2.40%2.62%2.57%2.60%2.65%2.05%
VBLLX
Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.77%4.66%4.64%3.75%4.16%2.89%5.84%3.62%3.82%3.69%4.19%4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBLLX and FMSFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBLLX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to FMSFX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBLLX dropped -38.42% vs FMSFX's -18.81%.

FMSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBLLX and FMSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer