PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBLLX vs. SWAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBLLX vs. SWAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBLLX achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly higher than SWAGX's 0.05% return.


VBLLX

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.69%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.57%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
1.61%
5Y*
-3.83%
10Y*
0.75%

SWAGX

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.05%
6M
0.40%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBLLX vs. SWAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBLLX
Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.27%6.60%-4.12%7.13%-27.20%-3.08%16.27%19.15%-4.71%9.70%
SWAGX
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
0.05%7.11%1.38%5.46%-13.62%-2.29%7.39%8.64%-0.11%2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between VBLLX and SWAGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2017

0.91

The correlation between VBLLX and SWAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBLLX vs. SWAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBLLX
VBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
VBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

SWAGX
SWAGX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SWAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
SWAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBLLX vs. SWAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBLLXSWAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.19

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.91

1.42

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.27

4.02

-1.75

VBLLX vs. SWAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBLLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the SWAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBLLX and SWAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBLLX vs. SWAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBLLX drawdown since its inception was -38.42%, which is greater than SWAGX's maximum drawdown of -19.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBLLX and SWAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBLLXSWAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.42%

-19.68%

-18.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.98%

-3.05%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

-6.14%

-8.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.29%

-18.76%

-17.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.66%

-3.71%

-20.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-5.67%

-3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

1.07%

+1.33%

Volatility

VBLLX vs. SWAGX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VBLLX) has a higher volatility of 2.08% compared to Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SWAGX) at 1.09%. This indicates that VBLLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBLLXSWAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

1.09%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.88%

2.96%

+2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.11%

3.98%

+4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

6.09%

+6.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.59%

5.11%

+6.48%

VBLLX vs. SWAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBLLX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SWAGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBLLX vs. SWAGX - Dividend Comparison

VBLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than SWAGX's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWAGX
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
4.15%4.02%3.88%3.22%1.93%1.56%2.47%2.87%2.80%1.98%0.00%0.00%
VBLLX
Vanguard Long-Term Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares
4.78%4.66%4.64%3.75%4.16%2.89%5.84%3.62%3.82%3.69%4.19%4.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VBLLX and SWAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBLLX has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to SWAGX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBLLX dropped -38.42% vs SWAGX's -19.68%.

SWAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBLLX and SWAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer