VBK vs. IYH
VBK (Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF) and IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBK is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VBK returned 11.82%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for IYH. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VBK charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IYH.
Performance
VBK vs. IYH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly higher than IYH's -0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, VBK has outperformed IYH with an annualized return of 11.82%, while IYH has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.
VBK
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 16.25%
- 6M
- 14.67%
- 1Y
- 29.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
IYH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 14.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
VBK vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 16.25% | 8.50% | 16.50% | 21.45% | -28.44% | 5.66% | 35.44% | 32.75% | -5.70% | 21.87% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | -0.65% | 13.16% | 2.99% | 2.14% | -4.46% | 23.41% | 15.56% | 20.80% | 5.80% | 22.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBK and IYH is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VBK and IYH has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VBK vs. IYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VBK
IYH
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VBK
IYH
-
Industrials
VBK
IYH
-
Healthcare
VBK
IYH
Consumer Cyclical
VBK
IYH
-
Financial Services
VBK
IYH
-
Energy
VBK
IYH
-
Real Estate
VBK
IYH
-
Communication Services
VBK
IYH
-
Basic Materials
VBK
IYH
-
Consumer Defensive
VBK
IYH
-
Utilities
VBK
IYH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBK vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank
VBK
IYH
VBK vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBK | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.17 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 1.33 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.82 | 3.18 | +6.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBK vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than IYH's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and IYH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBK | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -43.12% | -15.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.44% | -10.64% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.54% | -17.91% | -9.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.39% | -17.91% | -20.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.70% | -28.40% | -10.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -3.94% | +1.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.14% | -8.96% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 4.46% | -1.41% |
Volatility
VBK vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) at 4.94%. This indicates that VBK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBK | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 4.94% | +2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | 10.64% | +4.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.96% | 15.10% | +4.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 14.96% | +8.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 16.74% | +6.18% |
VBK vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
VBK vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison
VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than IYH's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.25% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.36% | 0.44% | 0.57% | 0.79% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBK and IYH have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VBK has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to IYH (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs IYH's -43.12%.
On 10-year performance, VBK leads with 11.82% vs 9.52% for IYH. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IYH has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VBK has performed better with a 11.82% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.
IYH has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.45% for VBK.
VBK is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while IYH is Health & Biotech Equities. VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBK and 0.43% for IYH.
VBK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VBK and IYH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer