PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBK vs. FYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBK vs. FYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly lower than FYC's 26.21% return. Over the past 10 years, VBK has underperformed FYC with an annualized return of 10.92%, while FYC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return.


VBK

1D
1.81%
1M
-3.14%
6M
10.32%
YTD
14.98%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
10.92%
ALL TIME*
9.83%

FYC

1D
2.16%
1M
-1.88%
6M
20.00%
YTD
26.21%
1Y
55.69%
3Y*
25.74%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
14.09%
ALL TIME*
12.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$12.93M$9.96M$7.81M
$70.46M$72.06M$83.50M

VBK vs. FYC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
14.98%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
26.21%24.24%23.99%14.52%-25.86%21.64%32.34%16.79%-5.54%22.97%

Correlation

The correlation between VBK and FYC is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011

0.91

The correlation between VBK and FYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBK vs. FYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBK
FYC

Technology

27.1%
17.5%

Industrials

23.4%
17.6%

Healthcare

17.9%
27.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
9.4%

Financial Services

5.7%
8.9%

Real Estate

3.7%
5.4%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.8%

Energy

3.4%
2.1%

Basic Materials

3.1%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
2.9%

Utilities

1.1%
1.5%

Technology

VBK
27.1%
FYC
17.5%

Industrials

VBK
23.4%
FYC
17.6%

Healthcare

VBK
17.9%
FYC
27.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VBK
8.9%
FYC
9.4%

Financial Services

VBK
5.7%
FYC
8.9%

Real Estate

VBK
3.7%
FYC
5.4%

Communication Services

VBK
3.6%
FYC
3.8%

Energy

VBK
3.4%
FYC
2.1%

Basic Materials

VBK
3.1%
FYC
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

VBK
2.0%
FYC
2.9%

Utilities

VBK
1.1%
FYC
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBK vs. FYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VBK vs. FYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VBKFYCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.41

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

5.34

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.52

17.07

-9.55

VBK vs. FYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBK Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the FYC Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBK and FYC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VBK vs. FYC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than FYC's maximum drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and FYC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBKFYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-47.85%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-10.48%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-27.79%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.39%

-35.37%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

-47.85%

+9.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

-4.84%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.10%

-9.59%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

3.27%

+0.12%

Volatility

VBK vs. FYC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) have volatilities of 5.46% and 5.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBKFYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

5.46%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

16.21%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

21.74%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.67%

23.70%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.92%

24.63%

-1.71%

VBK vs. FYC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBK has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FYC's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBK vs. FYC - Dividend Comparison

VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than FYC's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.17%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.44%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VBK and FYC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FYC has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to VBK (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs FYC's -47.85%.

On 10-year performance, FYC leads with 14.09% vs 10.92% for VBK. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYC has performed better with a 14.09% return vs 10.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.

VBK has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.17% for FYC.

VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VBK and 0.71% for FYC.

FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBK and FYC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer