PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBK vs. FYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBK vs. FYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBK achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly lower than FYC's 20.01% return. Over the past 10 years, VBK has underperformed FYC with an annualized return of 11.74%, while FYC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.30% annualized return.


VBK

1D
-1.06%
1M
4.84%
YTD
17.41%
6M
16.96%
1Y
32.77%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
11.74%

FYC

1D
-0.91%
1M
3.23%
YTD
20.01%
6M
20.96%
1Y
53.40%
3Y*
26.12%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBK vs. FYC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
17.41%8.50%16.50%21.45%-28.44%5.66%35.44%32.75%-5.70%21.87%
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
20.01%24.24%23.99%14.52%-25.86%21.64%32.34%16.79%-5.54%22.97%

Correlation

The correlation between VBK and FYC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2011

0.91

The correlation between VBK and FYC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VBK vs. FYC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VBK
FYC

Technology

25.9%
13.7%

Industrials

24.7%
13.4%

Healthcare

15.3%
27.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
9.9%

Financial Services

5.6%
10.3%

Energy

4.8%
3.4%

Real Estate

3.9%
8.4%

Communication Services

3.5%
3.4%

Basic Materials

3.2%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
3.8%

Utilities

1.2%
1.5%

Technology

VBK
25.9%
FYC
13.7%

Industrials

VBK
24.7%
FYC
13.4%

Healthcare

VBK
15.3%
FYC
27.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VBK
9.6%
FYC
9.9%

Financial Services

VBK
5.6%
FYC
10.3%

Energy

VBK
4.8%
FYC
3.4%

Real Estate

VBK
3.9%
FYC
8.4%

Communication Services

VBK
3.5%
FYC
3.4%

Basic Materials

VBK
3.2%
FYC
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

VBK
2.4%
FYC
3.8%

Utilities

VBK
1.2%
FYC
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBK vs. FYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBK
VBK Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
VBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
VBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FYC
FYC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBK vs. FYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBKFYCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

5.12

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

18.64

-7.66

VBK vs. FYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBK Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the FYC Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBK and FYC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBKFYCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.55

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

0.45

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.58

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.54

-0.11

Drawdowns

VBK vs. FYC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBK drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than FYC's maximum drawdown of -47.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBK and FYC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBKFYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-47.85%

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-10.48%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.54%

-27.79%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.39%

-35.37%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

-47.85%

+9.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.06%

-1.83%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.15%

-9.66%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.87%

+0.12%

Volatility

VBK vs. FYC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) and First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FYC) have volatilities of 5.37% and 5.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBKFYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

5.53%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.62%

14.99%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.21%

21.03%

-1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.48%

23.62%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

24.57%

-1.71%

VBK vs. FYC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBK has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FYC's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

VBK vs. FYC - Dividend Comparison

VBK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than FYC's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYC
First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.07%0.08%0.72%0.58%0.00%0.63%0.12%0.39%0.09%0.10%0.31%0.21%
VBK
Vanguard Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.45%0.54%0.54%0.68%0.55%0.36%0.44%0.57%0.79%0.82%1.08%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VBK and FYC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FYC has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to VBK (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBK dropped -58.68% vs FYC's -47.85%.

On 10-year performance, FYC leads with 14.30% vs 11.74% for VBK. On fees, VBK is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VBK has been the lower-risk option at 5.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FYC has performed better with a 14.30% return vs 11.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBK is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FYC.

VBK has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.07% for FYC.

VBK tracks CRSP US Small Cap Growth Index, while FYC tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Small Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VBK and 0.71% for FYC.

FYC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBK and FYC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer