PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBIL vs. XHLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBIL vs. XHLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VBIL achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly higher than XHLF's 1.39% return.


VBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.81%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XHLF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.69%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBIL vs. XHLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VBIL and XHLF is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBIL vs. XHLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBIL
VBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
VBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

XHLF
XHLF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
XHLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHLF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
XHLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHLF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBIL vs. XHLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) and BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VBILXHLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

21.07

11.75

+9.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

42.54

98.81

-56.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

531.60

670.31

-138.71

VBIL vs. XHLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VBIL Sharpe Ratio is 15.14, which is comparable to the XHLF Sharpe Ratio of 12.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VBIL and XHLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBILXHLFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14

12.43

+2.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

13.45

10.74

+2.71

Drawdowns

VBIL vs. XHLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.09%, smaller than the maximum XHLF drawdown of -0.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBIL and XHLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBILXHLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-0.11%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.09%

-0.04%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.01%

0.00%

Volatility

VBIL vs. XHLF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF (VBIL) is 0.06%, while BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XHLF) has a volatility of 0.08%. This indicates that VBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XHLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBILXHLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

0.08%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.16%

0.22%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26%

0.32%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.30%

0.42%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.30%

0.42%

-0.12%

VBIL vs. XHLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBIL has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than XHLF's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBIL vs. XHLF - Dividend Comparison

VBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than XHLF's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
VBIL
Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
3.65%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHLF
BondBloxx Bloomberg Six Month Target Duration US Treasury ETF
3.85%3.98%4.96%4.50%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBIL and XHLF have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XHLF has higher volatility (0.08%) compared to VBIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VBIL dropped -0.09% vs XHLF's -0.11%.

On 1-year performance, VBIL leads with 3.93% vs 3.92% for XHLF. On fees, XHLF is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VBIL has performed better with a 3.93% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XHLF is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VBIL.

XHLF has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 3.65% for VBIL.

VBIL is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while XHLF is Government Bonds. VBIL tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bills 0-3 Months Index, while XHLF tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 6 Month Duration Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VBIL and 0.03% for XHLF.

VBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.14 vs 12.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBIL and XHLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer