VBCF vs. VCSH
VBCF (Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF) and VCSH (Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from Vanguard - VBCF tracks the ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index while VCSH tracks the Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VBCF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VCSH.
Performance
VBCF vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCF
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCSH
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.47%
- 5Y*
- 2.27%
- 10Y*
- 2.67%
VBCF vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.01% |
VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCF and VCSH is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCF vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank
VBCF
VCSH
VBCF vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCF) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBCF | VCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 1.01 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
VBCF vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCF drawdown since its inception was -1.86%, smaller than the maximum VCSH drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCF and VCSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCF | VCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -12.86% | +11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -12.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -0.55% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -0.97% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.34% | — |
Volatility
VBCF vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCF | VCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 1.90% | +2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 2.88% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 3.35% | +0.98% |
VBCF vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCF vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison
VBCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than VCSH's 4.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VBCF Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.46% | 4.35% | 3.96% | 3.09% | 2.01% | 1.81% | 2.27% | 2.87% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 2.10% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, VBCF and VCSH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VCSH is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCSH is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCF.
VCSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 0.50% for VBCF.
VBCF tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while VCSH tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCF and 0.04% for VCSH.
Find the right allocation for VBCF and VCSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer