VBCC vs. SCHJ
VBCC (Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF) and SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VBCC is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2029 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while SCHJ is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. VBCC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHJ.
Performance
VBCC vs. SCHJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCC
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SCHJ
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 2.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.98M | $7.81M | $6.46M | |
| $576.39K | $637.25K | $642.30K |
VBCC vs. SCHJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCC Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.01% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCC and SCHJ is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCC vs. SCHJ — Risk / Return Rank
VBCC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHJ
VBCC vs. SCHJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCC) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VBCC | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.44 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VBCC vs. SCHJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCC drawdown since its inception was -0.79%, smaller than the maximum SCHJ drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCC and SCHJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCC | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.79% | -13.62% | +12.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.33% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -1.85% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.39% | — |
Volatility
VBCC vs. SCHJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCC | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19% | 1.93% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.19% | 2.95% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.19% | 4.10% | -1.91% |
VBCC vs. SCHJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHJ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCC vs. SCHJ - Dividend Comparison
VBCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than SCHJ's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.09% | 4.42% | 4.00% | 2.98% | 1.64% | 0.94% | 2.54% | 0.42% |
VBCC Vanguard Target Maturity 2029 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, VBCC and SCHJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHJ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHJ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for VBCC.
SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 0.79% for VBCC.
VBCC is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SCHJ is Short-Term Bond. VBCC tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Corporate Constrained Index, while SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US 1-5 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCC and 0.03% for SCHJ.
Find the right allocation for VBCC and SCHJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer