VBCA vs. LQDH
VBCA (Vanguard Target Maturity 2027 Corporate Bond ETF) and LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. VBCA is passively managed, while LQDH is actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VBCA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.
Performance
VBCA vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VBCA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 4.64%
VBCA vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VBCA Vanguard Target Maturity 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.00% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 2.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between VBCA and LQDH is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VBCA vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank
VBCA
LQDH
VBCA vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCA) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VBCA | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.67 | 0.58 | +5.08 |
Drawdowns
VBCA vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VBCA drawdown since its inception was -0.19%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCA and LQDH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VBCA | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.19% | -24.63% | +24.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.09% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -1.68% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.55% | — |
Volatility
VBCA vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VBCA | LQDH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97% | 2.70% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.97% | 4.41% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.97% | 6.44% | -5.47% |
VBCA vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VBCA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VBCA vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison
VBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than LQDH's 5.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.95% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
VBCA Vanguard Target Maturity 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VBCA and LQDH have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VBCA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VBCA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.
LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 0.42% for VBCA.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCA and 0.25% for LQDH.
Find the right allocation for VBCA and LQDH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer