PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VBCA vs. LQDH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VBCA vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Maturity 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCA) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VBCA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LQDH

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.29%
YTD
2.31%
6M
3.11%
1Y
7.62%
3Y*
8.08%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
4.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VBCA vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VBCA and LQDH is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VBCA vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VBCA

LQDH
LQDH Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
LQDH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDH Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDH Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VBCA vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Maturity 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCA) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VBCA vs. LQDH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VBCALQDHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.67

0.58

+5.08

Drawdowns

VBCA vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VBCA drawdown since its inception was -0.19%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VBCA and LQDH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VBCALQDHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.19%

-24.63%

+24.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.09%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.05%

-1.68%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

Volatility

VBCA vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VBCALQDHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97%

2.70%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.97%

4.41%

-3.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.97%

6.44%

-5.47%

VBCA vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VBCA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VBCA vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison

VBCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than LQDH's 5.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LQDH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
5.95%6.06%7.57%7.69%3.73%1.65%2.22%3.09%5.08%2.37%2.33%2.98%
VBCA
Vanguard Target Maturity 2027 Corporate Bond ETF
0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VBCA and LQDH have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VBCA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VBCA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.

LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 0.42% for VBCA.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VBCA and 0.25% for LQDH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VBCA and LQDH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer